From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
To: Hebbar Gururaja <gururaja.hebbar@ti.com>
Cc: <khilman@linaro.org>, <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
<linus.walleij@linaro.org>, <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
<davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com>,
<devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <vaibhav.bedia@ti.com>,
<sudhakar.raj@ti.com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>, <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/11] i2c: omap: enhance pinctrl support
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 17:55:38 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51A8B9EA.6030604@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1369995191-20855-12-git-send-email-gururaja.hebbar@ti.com>
On 05/31/2013 01:13 PM, Hebbar Gururaja wrote:
> Amend the I2C omap pin controller to optionally take a pin control
> handle and set the state of the pins to:
>
> - "default" on boot, resume and before performing an i2c transfer
> - "idle" after initial default, after resume default, and after each
> i2c xfer
> - "sleep" on suspend()
>
> By optionally putting the pins into sleep state in the suspend callback
> we can accomplish two things.
> - One is to minimize current leakage from pins and thus save power,
> - second, we can prevent the IP from driving pins output in an
> uncontrolled manner, which may happen if the power domain drops the
> domain regulator.
>
> Note:
> A .suspend & .resume callback is added which simply puts the pins to sleep
> state upon suspend & are moved to default & idle state upon resume.
>
> If any of the above pin states are missing in dt, a warning message
> about the missing state is displayed.
> If certain pin-states are not available, to remove this warning message
> pass respective state name with null phandler.
>
> (Changes based on i2c-nomadik.c)
>
> Signed-off-by: Hebbar Gururaja <gururaja.hebbar@ti.com>
> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
> Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> :100644 100644 e02f9e3... 588ba28... M drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 105 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
> index e02f9e3..588ba28 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
> @@ -214,7 +214,11 @@ struct omap_i2c_dev {
> u16 westate;
> u16 errata;
>
> - struct pinctrl *pins;
> + /* Three pin states - default, idle & sleep */
> + struct pinctrl *pinctrl;
> + struct pinctrl_state *pins_default;
> + struct pinctrl_state *pins_idle;
> + struct pinctrl_state *pins_sleep;
> };
>
> static const u8 reg_map_ip_v1[] = {
> @@ -641,6 +645,11 @@ omap_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg msgs[], int num)
> if (IS_ERR_VALUE(r))
> goto out;
>
The current HWMOD framework configures PINs to enable state before
enabling the device and
switch PINs to idle state after disabling the device. Why here its done
in different order?
> + /* Optionaly enable pins to be muxed in and configured */
> + if (!IS_ERR(dev->pins_default))
> + if (pinctrl_select_state(dev->pinctrl, dev->pins_default))
> + dev_err(dev->dev, "could not set default pins\n");
> +
> r = omap_i2c_wait_for_bb(dev);
> if (r < 0)
> goto out;
> @@ -664,7 +673,13 @@ omap_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg msgs[], int num)
>
> out:
> pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(dev->dev);
> +
> pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev->dev);
> + /* Optionally let pins go into idle state */
> + if (!IS_ERR(dev->pins_idle))
> + if (pinctrl_select_state(dev->pinctrl, dev->pins_idle))
> + dev_err(dev->dev, "could not set pins to idle state\n");
> +
> return r;
> }
>
> @@ -1123,14 +1138,47 @@ omap_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> dev->set_mpu_wkup_lat = pdata->set_mpu_wkup_lat;
> }
>
> - dev->pins = devm_pinctrl_get_select_default(&pdev->dev);
> - if (IS_ERR(dev->pins)) {
> - if (PTR_ERR(dev->pins) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + dev->pinctrl = devm_pinctrl_get(&pdev->dev);
May be struct device ->pins->p can be used instead of dev->pinctrl?
> + if (!IS_ERR(dev->pinctrl)) {
> + dev->pins_default = pinctrl_lookup_state(dev->pinctrl,
> + PINCTRL_STATE_DEFAULT);
> + if (IS_ERR(dev->pins_default))
> + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "could not get default pinstate\n");
> + else
> + if (pinctrl_select_state(dev->pinctrl,
> + dev->pins_default))
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> + "could not set default pinstate\n");
Don't need to set Default pin state
Default pins state is applied by DD framework automatically before
device probing
and stored in struct device ->pins->default_state
> +
> + dev->pins_idle = pinctrl_lookup_state(dev->pinctrl,
> + PINCTRL_STATE_IDLE);
> + if (IS_ERR(dev->pins_idle))
> + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "could not get idle pinstate\n");
> + else
> + /* If possible, let's idle until the first transfer */
> + if (pinctrl_select_state(dev->pinctrl, dev->pins_idle))
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> + "could not set idle pinstate\n");
> +
> + dev->pins_sleep = pinctrl_lookup_state(dev->pinctrl,
> + PINCTRL_STATE_SLEEP);
> + if (IS_ERR(dev->pins_sleep))
> + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "could not get sleep pinstate\n");
> + } else {
> + if (PTR_ERR(dev->pinctrl) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>
> - dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "did not get pins for i2c error: %li\n",
> - PTR_ERR(dev->pins));
> - dev->pins = NULL;
> + /*
> + * Since we continue even when pinctrl node is not found,
> + * Invalidate pins as not available. This is to make sure that
> + * IS_ERR(pins_xxx) results in failure when used.
> + */
> + dev->pins_default = ERR_PTR(-ENODATA);
> + dev->pins_idle = ERR_PTR(-ENODATA);
> + dev->pins_sleep = ERR_PTR(-ENODATA);
> +
> + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "did not get pins for i2c error: %li\n",
> + PTR_ERR(dev->pinctrl));
> }
>
> dev->dev = &pdev->dev;
> @@ -1300,6 +1348,10 @@ static int omap_i2c_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> omap_i2c_read_reg(_dev, OMAP_I2C_STAT_REG);
> }
>
> + if (!IS_ERR(_dev->pins_idle))
> + if (pinctrl_select_state(_dev->pinctrl, _dev->pins_idle))
> + dev_err(dev, "could not set pins to idle state\n");
> +
It's done in omap_i2c_xfer
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -1311,13 +1363,59 @@ static int omap_i2c_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> if (!_dev->regs)
> return 0;
>
> + /* Optionally place the pins to the default state */
> + if (!IS_ERR(_dev->pins_default))
> + if (pinctrl_select_state(_dev->pinctrl, _dev->pins_default))
> + dev_err(dev, "could not set pins to default state\n");
> +
It's done in omap_i2c_xfer
> __omap_i2c_init(_dev);
>
> return 0;
> }
> #endif /* CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME */
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> +static int omap_i2c_suspend(struct device *dev)
Please, use .suspend_noirq() - it's possible that I2C will be used
even after "device suspend" stage especially on SMP platforms((( ),
but its prohibited to use it after "suspend_noirq" stage (
> +{
> + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> + struct omap_i2c_dev *_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
Here is the better way to detect late I2C activities during suspending:
i2c_lock_adapter(&_dev->adapter);
/* Check for active I2C transaction */
if (atomic_read(&dev->power.usage_count) > 1) {
dev_info(dev,
"active I2C transaction detected - suspend aborted\n");
return -EBUSY;
}
i2c_unlock_adapter(&_dev->adapter);
> + if (omap_i2c_wait_for_bb(_dev) < 0) {
> + pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
> + return -EBUSY;
> + }
> + pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR(_dev->pins_sleep))
> + if (pinctrl_select_state(_dev->pinctrl, _dev->pins_sleep))
> + dev_err(dev, "could not set pins to sleep state\n");
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
Not sure it's right - Lest assume suspend_noirq() is used here.
Then, at this point, OMAP device framework will disable device
(_od_suspend_noirq()).
But PINs will be switched to IDLE state before that. Is it ok?
Possibly Kevin could clarify this point?
> +
> +static int omap_i2c_resume(struct device *dev)
Please, use .resume_noirq()
> +{
The same is here - OMAP device framework will enable device
(_od_suspend_noirq()) here.
But PINs are still in IDLE state???
> + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> + struct omap_i2c_dev *_dev = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> + /* First go to the default state */
> + if (!IS_ERR(_dev->pins_default))
> + if (pinctrl_select_state(_dev->pinctrl, _dev->pins_default))
> + dev_err(dev, "could not set pins to default state\n");
> +
> + /* Then let's idle the pins until the next transfer happens */
> + if (!IS_ERR(_dev->pins_idle))
> + if (pinctrl_select_state(_dev->pinctrl, _dev->pins_idle))
> + dev_err(dev, "could not set pins to idle state\n");
> +
This is wrong - at this moment I2C device can be as in Enabled state
as in Disabled
> + return 0;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> +
> static struct dev_pm_ops omap_i2c_pm_ops = {
> + SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(omap_i2c_suspend, omap_i2c_resume)
> SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(omap_i2c_runtime_suspend,
> omap_i2c_runtime_resume, NULL)
> };
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-31 14:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-31 10:13 [PATCH 00/11] drivers: Add Pinctrl PM support Hebbar Gururaja
2013-05-31 10:13 ` [PATCH 01/11] pinctrl: single: adopt pinctrl sleep mode management Hebbar Gururaja
2013-06-17 11:32 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-17 12:03 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-06-17 16:08 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-17 17:27 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-05-31 10:13 ` [PATCH 02/11] leds: leds-gpio: Enhance pinctrl support Hebbar Gururaja
2013-06-04 7:18 ` Linus Walleij
2013-05-31 10:13 ` [PATCH 03/11] Input: gpio_keys: Adopt " Hebbar Gururaja
2013-05-31 10:13 ` [PATCH 04/11] Input: matrix-keypad: " Hebbar Gururaja
2013-05-31 10:13 ` [PATCH 05/11] spi: omap2-mcspi: enhance " Hebbar Gururaja
2013-06-01 19:27 ` Mark Brown
2013-06-04 9:53 ` Hebbar, Gururaja
2013-05-31 10:13 ` [PATCH 06/11] usb: musb: dsps: Adopt " Hebbar Gururaja
2013-05-31 10:13 ` [PATCH 07/11] pwm: pwm-tiehrpwm: enhance " Hebbar Gururaja
2013-05-31 10:13 ` [PATCH 08/11] pwm: pwm-tiecap: " Hebbar Gururaja
2013-05-31 10:13 ` [PATCH 09/11] mmc: omap_hsmmc: " Hebbar Gururaja
2013-06-04 7:11 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-04 7:19 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-04 9:52 ` Hebbar, Gururaja
2013-06-04 14:46 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-06-07 13:36 ` Balaji T K
2013-06-07 21:01 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-05-31 10:13 ` [PATCH 10/11] video: da8xx-fb: adopt " Hebbar Gururaja
2013-05-31 10:13 ` [PATCH 11/11] i2c: omap: enhance " Hebbar Gururaja
2013-05-31 14:55 ` Grygorii Strashko [this message]
2013-06-05 9:04 ` Hebbar, Gururaja
2013-05-31 17:34 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-06-04 11:39 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-06-05 9:05 ` Hebbar, Gururaja
[not found] ` <87bo7r10s9.fsf@linaro.org>
2013-06-04 7:23 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-04 9:50 ` Hebbar, Gururaja
2013-05-31 17:04 ` [PATCH 00/11] drivers: Add Pinctrl PM support Dmitry Torokhov
2013-05-31 18:08 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-06-04 7:25 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-04 18:15 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-06-04 18:37 ` Mark Brown
2013-06-05 12:41 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51A8B9EA.6030604@ti.com \
--to=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com \
--cc=devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=gururaja.hebbar@ti.com \
--cc=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=sudhakar.raj@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=vaibhav.bedia@ti.com \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox