From: Dave Chiluk <chiluk@canonical.com>
To: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, petr@vandrovec.name,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ncpfs: fix rmdir returns Device or resource busy
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 16:40:08 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51A918B8.20303@canonical.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1369781410-24473-1-git-send-email-chiluk@canonical.com>
Any thoughts on this? NCPFS seems to be the forgotten, left-behind,
red-headed stepchild of the fs community.
Dave.
On 05/28/2013 05:50 PM, Dave Chiluk wrote:
> 1d2ef5901483004d74947bbf78d5146c24038fe7 caused a regression in ncpfs such that
> directories could no longer be removed. This was because ncp_rmdir checked
> to see if a dentry could be unhashed before allowing it to be removed. Since
> 1d2ef5901483004d74947bbf78d5146c24038fe7 introduced a change that incremented
> dentry->d_count causing it to always be greater than 1 unhash would always
> fail. Thus causing the error path in ncp_rmdir to always be taken. Removing
> this error path is safe as unhashing is still accomplished by calls to dput
> from vfs_rmdir.
> ---
> fs/ncpfs/dir.c | 9 ---------
> 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ncpfs/dir.c b/fs/ncpfs/dir.c
> index 8163260..6792ce1 100644
> --- a/fs/ncpfs/dir.c
> +++ b/fs/ncpfs/dir.c
> @@ -1029,15 +1029,6 @@ static int ncp_rmdir(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry)
> DPRINTK("ncp_rmdir: removing %s/%s\n",
> dentry->d_parent->d_name.name, dentry->d_name.name);
>
> - /*
> - * fail with EBUSY if there are still references to this
> - * directory.
> - */
> - dentry_unhash(dentry);
> - error = -EBUSY;
> - if (!d_unhashed(dentry))
> - goto out;
> -
> len = sizeof(__name);
> error = ncp_io2vol(server, __name, &len, dentry->d_name.name,
> dentry->d_name.len, !ncp_preserve_case(dir));
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-31 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-28 22:50 [PATCH] ncpfs: fix rmdir returns Device or resource busy Dave Chiluk
2013-05-31 21:40 ` Dave Chiluk [this message]
[not found] ` <CA+i2_De5HHw2H9SvZ=W+QAOcy0M7jFac88OK6aeYdJVCGL6b+A@mail.gmail.com>
2013-06-05 20:20 ` Dave Chiluk
2013-06-07 6:43 ` Petr Vandrovec
2013-06-07 16:09 ` Dave Chiluk
2013-06-07 16:14 ` Al Viro
2013-06-13 2:01 ` Al Viro
2013-06-13 6:42 ` Al Viro
2013-06-14 4:19 ` Dave Chiluk
2013-06-15 5:09 ` Al Viro
2013-06-15 5:26 ` Al Viro
2013-06-14 4:02 ` Dave Chiluk
2013-06-19 9:30 ` Luis Henriques
2013-06-26 1:05 ` Ben Hutchings
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51A918B8.20303@canonical.com \
--to=chiluk@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=petr@vandrovec.name \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox