From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, bp@alien8.de, pjt@google.com,
namhyung@kernel.org, efault@gmx.de, morten.rasmussen@arm.com,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org, preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
viresh.kumar@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mgorman@suse.de, riel@redhat.com, wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>,
Changlong Xie <changlongx.xie@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [patch v7 0/8] sched: using runnable load avg in balance
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 14:43:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51AC3B2C.9050209@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1369897324-16646-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com>
On 05/30/2013 03:01 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
> Anyway, since using runnable load avg in balance brings much benefit on
> performance and power. and this patch was reviewed for long time.
> So maybe it's time to let it clobbered in some sub-maintain tree, like tip
> or linux-next. Any comments?
>
Peter,
What's your opinion about this patchset? Are there sth missing? :)
The patchset git tree is here:
git@github.com:alexshi/power-scheduling.git runnablelb
> [patch v7 1/8] Revert "sched: Introduce temporary FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
> [patch v7 2/8] sched: move few runnable tg variables into CONFIG_SMP
> [patch v7 3/8] sched: set initial value of runnable avg for new
> [patch v7 4/8] sched: fix slept time double counting in enqueue
> [patch v7 5/8] sched: update cpu load after task_tick.
Patch 2~5 are the bug fixing.
> [patch v7 6/8] sched: compute runnable load avg in cpu_load and
> [patch v7 7/8] sched: consider runnable load average in move_tasks
Only patch 6th/7th enable the runnable load in load balance.
> [patch v7 8/8] sched: remove blocked_load_avg in tg
According to test, the 8th patch has performance gain.
--
Thanks
Alex
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-03 6:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-30 7:01 [patch v7 0/8] sched: using runnable load avg in balance Alex Shi
2013-05-30 7:01 ` [patch v7 1/8] Revert "sched: Introduce temporary FAIR_GROUP_SCHED dependency for load-tracking" Alex Shi
2013-05-30 7:01 ` [patch v7 2/8] sched: move few runnable tg variables into CONFIG_SMP Alex Shi
2013-05-30 7:01 ` [patch v7 3/8] sched: set initial value of runnable avg for new forked task Alex Shi
2013-05-30 7:02 ` [patch v7 4/8] sched: fix slept time double counting in enqueue entity Alex Shi
2013-05-30 7:02 ` [patch v7 5/8] sched: update cpu load after task_tick Alex Shi
2013-05-30 7:02 ` [patch v7 6/8] sched: compute runnable load avg in cpu_load and cpu_avg_load_per_task Alex Shi
2013-05-30 7:02 ` [patch v7 7/8] sched: consider runnable load average in move_tasks Alex Shi
2013-05-31 10:19 ` Morten Rasmussen
2013-05-31 15:07 ` Alex Shi
2013-05-30 7:02 ` [patch v7 8/8] sched: remove blocked_load_avg in tg Alex Shi
2013-06-03 6:43 ` Alex Shi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51AC3B2C.9050209@intel.com \
--to=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=changlongx.xie@intel.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=jason.low2@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox