From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@stratus.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Please add to stable: module: don't unlink the module until we've removed all exposure.
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 08:59:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51ACBD6A.1030304@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1306031012460.22652@jlaw-desktop.mno.stratus.com>
On 06/03/2013 07:17 AM, Joe Lawrence wrote:
>>> Hi Rusty,
>>>
>>> I had pointed Ben (offlist) to that bugzilla entry without realizing
>>> there were other earlier related fixes in this space. Re-viewing bz-
>>> 58011, it looks like it was opened against 3.8.12, while Ben and myself
>>> had encountered module loading problems in versions 3.9 and
>>> 3.9.[1-3]. I can update the bugzilla entry to add a comment noting commit
>>> a49b7e82 "kobject: fix kset_find_obj() race with concurrent last
>>> kobject_put()".
>>>
>>> That said, it doesn't appear that commit 944a1fa "module: don't unlink the
>>> module until we've removed all exposure" has not made it into any stable
>>> kernel. On my system, applying this on top of 3.9 resolved a module
>>> unload/load race that would occasionally occur on boot (two video adapters
>>> of the same make, the module unloads for whatever reason and I see "module
>>> is already loaded" and "sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename
>>> '/module/mgag200'" messages every 5-10% instances.) I have logs if you
>>> were interested in these warnings/crashes.
It at least works around the problem for me as well. But, a more rare
migration/[0-3] (I think) related lockup still exists in 3.9.4 for me,
so I will also try applying that other kobject patch and continue testing
today...
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-03 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-31 18:14 Please add to stable: module: don't unlink the module until we've removed all exposure Ben Greear
2013-06-02 5:09 ` Rusty Russell
2013-06-03 3:46 ` Joe Lawrence
2013-06-03 11:25 ` Joe Lawrence
2013-06-03 14:17 ` Joe Lawrence
2013-06-03 15:59 ` Ben Greear [this message]
2013-06-03 16:36 ` Ben Greear
2013-06-04 4:37 ` Rusty Russell
2013-06-04 5:56 ` Rusty Russell
2013-06-04 14:07 ` Joe Lawrence
2013-06-04 16:50 ` Joe Lawrence
2013-06-04 16:53 ` Ben Greear
2013-06-04 17:45 ` Ben Greear
2013-06-05 4:17 ` Rusty Russell
2013-06-05 7:15 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-05 16:59 ` Ben Greear
2013-06-05 18:48 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-05 19:11 ` Ben Greear
2013-06-05 19:31 ` stop_machine lockup issue in 3.9.y Ben Greear
2013-06-05 20:58 ` Ben Greear
2013-06-05 21:11 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-05 21:33 ` Ben Greear
2013-06-06 1:34 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-06-06 3:14 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-06 3:26 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-06-06 3:41 ` Ben Greear
2013-06-06 3:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-06-06 3:50 ` Ben Greear
2013-06-06 4:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-06-06 20:55 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-06 21:15 ` Ben Greear
2013-06-06 21:17 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-05 3:29 ` Please add to stable: module: don't unlink the module until we've removed all exposure Rusty Russell
2013-06-05 5:07 ` Greg KH
2013-06-05 7:13 ` Rusty Russell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51ACBD6A.1030304@candelatech.com \
--to=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=joe.lawrence@stratus.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox