public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
To: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@stratus.com>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Please add to stable:  module: don't unlink the module until we've removed all exposure.
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 09:36:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51ACC60B.8090504@candelatech.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51ACBD6A.1030304@candelatech.com>

On 06/03/2013 08:59 AM, Ben Greear wrote:
> On 06/03/2013 07:17 AM, Joe Lawrence wrote:
>
>>>> Hi Rusty,
>>>>
>>>> I had pointed Ben (offlist) to that bugzilla entry without realizing
>>>> there were other earlier related fixes in this space.  Re-viewing bz-
>>>> 58011, it looks like it was opened against 3.8.12, while Ben and myself
>>>> had encountered module loading problems in versions 3.9 and
>>>> 3.9.[1-3].  I can update the bugzilla entry to add a comment noting commit
>>>> a49b7e82 "kobject: fix kset_find_obj() race with concurrent last
>>>> kobject_put()".
>>>>
>>>> That said, it doesn't appear that commit 944a1fa "module: don't unlink the
>>>> module until we've removed all exposure" has not made it into any stable
>>>> kernel.  On my system, applying this on top of 3.9 resolved a module
>>>> unload/load race that would occasionally occur on boot (two video adapters
>>>> of the same make, the module unloads for whatever reason and I see "module
>>>> is already loaded" and "sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename
>>>> '/module/mgag200'" messages every 5-10% instances.)  I have logs if you
>>>> were interested in these warnings/crashes.
>
> It at least works around the problem for me as well.  But, a more rare
> migration/[0-3] (I think) related lockup still exists in 3.9.4 for me,
> so I will also try applying that other kobject patch and continue testing
> today...

Well, that other kobject patch is already in 3.9.4, so I think it's still
a good idea to include the
"module: don't unlink the module until we've removed all exposure."
patch in stable.  I have a decent test case to reproduce the crash, so if someone
wants me to test other patches instead, then I will do so.

Thanks,
Ben

-- 
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc  http://www.candelatech.com


  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-03 16:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-31 18:14 Please add to stable: module: don't unlink the module until we've removed all exposure Ben Greear
2013-06-02  5:09 ` Rusty Russell
2013-06-03  3:46   ` Joe Lawrence
2013-06-03 11:25     ` Joe Lawrence
2013-06-03 14:17       ` Joe Lawrence
2013-06-03 15:59         ` Ben Greear
2013-06-03 16:36           ` Ben Greear [this message]
2013-06-04  4:37             ` Rusty Russell
2013-06-04  5:56             ` Rusty Russell
2013-06-04 14:07               ` Joe Lawrence
2013-06-04 16:50                 ` Joe Lawrence
2013-06-04 16:53                 ` Ben Greear
2013-06-04 17:45                   ` Ben Greear
2013-06-05  4:17                     ` Rusty Russell
2013-06-05  7:15                       ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-05 16:59                         ` Ben Greear
2013-06-05 18:48                           ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-05 19:11                             ` Ben Greear
2013-06-05 19:31                               ` stop_machine lockup issue in 3.9.y Ben Greear
2013-06-05 20:58                                 ` Ben Greear
2013-06-05 21:11                                   ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-05 21:33                                     ` Ben Greear
2013-06-06  1:34                                     ` Eric Dumazet
2013-06-06  3:14                                       ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-06  3:26                                         ` Eric Dumazet
2013-06-06  3:41                                           ` Ben Greear
2013-06-06  3:46                                             ` Eric Dumazet
2013-06-06  3:50                                               ` Ben Greear
2013-06-06  4:08                                                 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-06-06 20:55                                             ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-06 21:15                                               ` Ben Greear
2013-06-06 21:17                                                 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-05  3:29                 ` Please add to stable: module: don't unlink the module until we've removed all exposure Rusty Russell
2013-06-05  5:07         ` Greg KH
2013-06-05  7:13           ` Rusty Russell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51ACC60B.8090504@candelatech.com \
    --to=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=joe.lawrence@stratus.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox