From: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 05/10] cpuset: re-structure update_cpumask() a bit
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 17:15:59 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51AF01CF.1070706@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51AF0183.8070602@huawei.com>
Check if cpus_allowed is to be changed before calling validate_change().
This won't change any behavior, but later it will allow us to do this:
# mkdir /cpuset/child
# echo $$ > /cpuset/child/tasks /* empty cpuset */
# echo > /cpuset/child/cpuset.cpus /* do nothing, won't fail */
Without this patch, the last operation will fail.
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
---
kernel/cpuset.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
index 51f8e1d..535dce6 100644
--- a/kernel/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
@@ -856,14 +856,15 @@ static int update_cpumask(struct cpuset *cs, struct cpuset *trialcs,
if (!cpumask_subset(trialcs->cpus_allowed, cpu_active_mask))
return -EINVAL;
}
- retval = validate_change(cs, trialcs);
- if (retval < 0)
- return retval;
/* Nothing to do if the cpus didn't change */
if (cpumask_equal(cs->cpus_allowed, trialcs->cpus_allowed))
return 0;
+ retval = validate_change(cs, trialcs);
+ if (retval < 0)
+ return retval;
+
retval = heap_init(&heap, PAGE_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL, NULL);
if (retval)
return retval;
--
1.8.0.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-05 9:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-05 9:14 [PATCH v2 00/10] cpuset: implement sane hierarchy behaviors Li Zefan
2013-06-05 9:15 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] cpuset: remove redundant check in cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() Li Zefan
2013-06-05 9:15 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] cpuset: cleanup guarantee_online_{cpus|mems}() Li Zefan
2013-06-05 9:15 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] cpuset: remove unnecessary variable in cpuset_attach() Li Zefan
2013-06-05 9:15 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] cpuset: remove cpuset_test_cpumask() Li Zefan
2013-06-05 9:15 ` Li Zefan [this message]
2013-06-05 20:57 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] cpuset: re-structure update_cpumask() a bit Tejun Heo
2013-06-05 9:16 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] cpuset: record old_mems_allowed in struct cpuset Li Zefan
2013-06-05 19:45 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-06 9:58 ` Li Zefan
2013-06-05 9:16 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] cpuset: introduce effective_{cpumask|nodemask}_cpuset() Li Zefan
2013-06-05 9:16 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] cpuset: allow to keep tasks in empty cpusets Li Zefan
2013-06-05 20:51 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-06 10:26 ` Li Zefan
2013-06-06 21:24 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-05 9:17 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] cpuset: allow to move tasks to " Li Zefan
2013-06-05 9:17 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] cpuset: fix to migrate mm correctly in a corner case Li Zefan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51AF01CF.1070706@huawei.com \
--to=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox