Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] pcmcia: at91_cf: clean up and add DT support

[Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>]

On 20/04/2013 00:54, Greg Kroah-Hartman :
> On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:51:23AM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> On 04/17/2013 10:39 AM, Fabio Porcedda :
>>> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> wrote:
>>>> These patches clean up at91_cf a bit and add DT bindings.
>>>> It is based on a previous series from Joachim Eastwood and other cleanup
>>>> patches by Fabio and Laurent.
>>>> I have collected them together as they are lying around for some time.
>>>>
>>>> Please tell me if It can go through PCMCIA tree or if Andrew or Greg can
>>>> take them.
>>>> Note that they are not bug fixes, so you can stack them for 3.10.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your help, best regards.
>>>>
>>>> v2: add 2 more cleanup patches:
>>>>          - move to module_platform_driver_probe()
>>>>          - little trivial indentation fix
>>>>
>>>> Fabio Porcedda (1):
>>>>    pcmcia: at91_cf: use module_platform_driver_probe()
>>>>
>>>> Joachim Eastwood (5):
>>>>    pcmcia: at91_cf: fix gpio_get_value in at91_cf_get_status
>>>>    pcmcia: at91_cf: convert to dev_ print functions
>>>>    pcmcia: at91_cf: use devm_ functions for allocations
>>>>    pcmcia: at91_cf: clean up header includes
>>>>    pcmcia: at91_cf: add support for DT
>>>>
>>>> Laurent Navet (1):
>>>>    pcmcia/trivial: at91_cf: fix checkpatch error
>>>>
>>>>   .../devicetree/bindings/ata/atmel-at91_cf.txt      |  19 +++
>>>>   drivers/pcmcia/Kconfig                             |   2 +-
>>>>   drivers/pcmcia/at91_cf.c                           | 176 ++++++++++-----------
>>>>   3 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
>>>>   create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/atmel-at91_cf.txt
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 1.8.0
>>>>
>>>
>>> Ping?
>>
>> Andrew, Greg, can you please take this series?
>>
>> Here is the post on lkml:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/21/246
>>
>> Here is the first patch in patchwork (1/7):
>> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2312691/
>>
>> Tell me if I can do something else to make this applied upstream...
>
> The PCMCIA maintainer should take these, not me.

I know Greg, but this patch series is still not taken by anyone 3 months 
after its first submission and after several requests by both Fabio and 
myself...

The series is still applying on linux-next today... Maybe it can go via 
Andrew, then...

Best regards,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre