From: Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de>
To: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] Re: adjusting the monotonic system time (from inside the kernel)
Date: Sat, 08 Jun 2013 10:23:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51B2E9EC.1000205@ahsoftware.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51B27182.8010506@linaro.org>
Am 08.06.2013 01:49, schrieb John Stultz:
> On 05/06/2013 07:02 AM, Alexander Holler wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm looking at how to adjust the (monotonic) system time from inside
>> the kernel.
>>
>> Use case is that I have a hw-clock which (not necessarily) regulary
>> sends a timestamp with millisecond precision which I want to use to
>> adjust the system time.
>>
>> It seems the usual solution to do such, is to use NTP which uses it's
>> own driver (which usually seems to be based on some serial connection):
>>
>> hw-clock --serial--> kernel --serial-device--> ntpd -> kernel ->
>> system-time
>>
>> So one solution would be to emulate such a serial device:
>>
>> hw-clock --> kernel --emulated-serial-device--> ntpd -> kernel ->
>> system-time
>>
>> Another solution would be to "invent" a ntp-device and write a driver
>> for ntpd to use it:
>>
>> hw-clock --> kernel --ntp-device--> ntpd -> kernel -> system-time
>>
>> But I would prefer the following:
>>
>> hw-clock --> kernel -> system-time
>>
>> Problem is that the hw-clock in question doesn't offer something like
>> a tick. It just might send a timestamp with millisecond precision
>> whenever it wants.
>>
>> Because I don't want to reinvent the wheel and because I think there
>> are some people which already have spend some thoughts on similiar
>> things, I'm asking here before I try to implement something which then
>> never might find it's way into the mainline kernel.
>>
>> Any hints, suggestions, whatever?
>
> Sorry on the delay to reply here, just noticed this in my spam folder
> (hopefully I've trained it not to catch your mails now).
>
> You probably want to check out do_adjtimex() in the kernel. It has a
> number of ways that allow for the clock to be slewed or jumped.
> Otherwise you probably should look into the PPS subsystems to see if it
> could be extended to support your needs.
Thanks, I've already digged around in the source for adjtimex to get a
clue about the ntp-api and how it works. At first view wasn't that
enlightened. ;)
But that now has to wait. If the new hctosys mechanism ends up in the
kernel, the millisecond support for rtc-hid-sensor-time will disappear
because rtc-hid-sensor-time will not set the time itself afterwards.
So I have to figure out and implement a new way to feed a timestamp with
milliseconds to hctosys.
My first idea would be to add a read_timeval() or even read_timespec()
to rtc_class_ops which would be used by hctosys instead of read_time()
if it exists.
Regards,
Alexander
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-08 8:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-06 14:02 adjusting the monotonic system time (from inside the kernel) Alexander Holler
2013-05-06 15:05 ` Alexander Holler
2013-06-07 23:49 ` John Stultz
2013-06-08 8:23 ` Alexander Holler [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51B2E9EC.1000205@ahsoftware.de \
--to=holler@ahsoftware.de \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox