From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: fix missed memory synchronization when patch hypercall
Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2013 17:08:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51B44612.6080704@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130609085937.GJ4725@redhat.com>
On 06/09/2013 04:59 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 04:56:42PM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>> On 06/09/2013 04:45 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jun 08, 2013 at 11:15:37AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
>>>> From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>
>>>> Currently, memory synchronization is missed in emulator_fix_hypercall,
>>>> please see the commit 758ccc89b83
>>>> (KVM: x86: drop calling kvm_mmu_zap_all in emulator_fix_hypercall)
>>>>
>>>> This patch fixes it by introducing kvm_vcpus_hang_on_page_start() and
>>>> kvm_vcpus_hang_on_page_end which unmap the patched page from guest
>>>> and use kvm_flush_remote_tlbs() as the serializing instruction to
>>>> ensure the memory coherence
>>>> [ The SDM said that INVEPT, INVVPID and MOV (to control register, with
>>>> the exception of MOV CR8) are the serializing instructions. ]
>>>>
>>>> The mmu-lock is held during host patches the page so that it stops vcpus
>>>> to fix its further page fault
>>>>
>>> I have a patch to implement is much simple and in generic way, not
>>> relying on MMU internals.
>>
>> I have considered this way but it seems not simple - it needs a new type of
>> request and it forces all vcpus to hang when host is patching the page.
>>
>> My approach is just reusing the mmu code and requires vcpus to hang only when
>> the patched page is bing accessed.
>
> That's very rare, no point to optimize this code path.
Fine to me. I do not have strong opinion on that, please apply your patch instead. ;)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-09 9:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-08 3:15 [PATCH] KVM: x86: fix missed memory synchronization when patch hypercall Xiao Guangrong
2013-06-09 8:45 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-06-09 8:56 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-06-09 8:59 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-06-09 9:08 ` Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2013-06-09 9:29 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-06-09 9:39 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-06-09 10:01 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-06-09 10:19 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-06-09 11:25 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-06-09 11:36 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-06-09 11:44 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-06-09 11:56 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-06-09 12:17 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-06-09 12:27 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-06-09 12:52 ` Xiao Guangrong
2013-06-18 14:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-06-18 15:22 ` Gleb Natapov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51B44612.6080704@gmail.com \
--to=xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com \
--cc=gleb@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox