From: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Cgroups <cgroups@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/7] cpuset: let hotplug propagation work wait for task attaching
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2013 17:14:22 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51B4476E.90202@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51B4475A.8030509@huawei.com>
Instead of triggering porpagation work in cpuset_attach(), we make
hotplug propagation work wait until there's no task attaching in
progress.
IMO this is more robust. We won't see empty masks in cpuset_attach().
Also it's a preparation for removing propagation work. Without asynchronous
propagation we can't call move_tasks_in_empty_cpuset() in cpuset_attach(),
because otherwise we'll deadlock on cgroup_mutex.
Signed-off-by: Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>
---
kernel/cpuset.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/cpuset.c b/kernel/cpuset.c
index 535dce6..5ffcc3b 100644
--- a/kernel/cpuset.c
+++ b/kernel/cpuset.c
@@ -59,6 +59,7 @@
#include <linux/mutex.h>
#include <linux/workqueue.h>
#include <linux/cgroup.h>
+#include <linux/wait.h>
/*
* Tracks how many cpusets are currently defined in system.
@@ -275,6 +276,8 @@ static void schedule_cpuset_propagate_hotplug(struct cpuset *cs);
static DECLARE_WORK(cpuset_hotplug_work, cpuset_hotplug_workfn);
+static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(cpuset_attach_wq);
+
/*
* This is ugly, but preserves the userspace API for existing cpuset
* users. If someone tries to mount the "cpuset" filesystem, we
@@ -1436,14 +1439,8 @@ static void cpuset_attach(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cgroup_taskset *tset)
}
cs->attach_in_progress--;
-
- /*
- * We may have raced with CPU/memory hotunplug. Trigger hotplug
- * propagation if @cs doesn't have any CPU or memory. It will move
- * the newly added tasks to the nearest parent which can execute.
- */
- if (cpumask_empty(cs->cpus_allowed) || nodes_empty(cs->mems_allowed))
- schedule_cpuset_propagate_hotplug(cs);
+ if (!cs->attach_in_progress)
+ wake_up(&cpuset_attach_wq);
mutex_unlock(&cpuset_mutex);
}
@@ -1555,10 +1552,6 @@ static int cpuset_write_resmask(struct cgroup *cgrp, struct cftype *cft,
* resources, wait for the previously scheduled operations before
* proceeding, so that we don't end up keep removing tasks added
* after execution capability is restored.
- *
- * Flushing cpuset_hotplug_work is enough to synchronize against
- * hotplug hanlding; however, cpuset_attach() may schedule
- * propagation work directly. Flush the workqueue too.
*/
flush_work(&cpuset_hotplug_work);
flush_workqueue(cpuset_propagate_hotplug_wq);
@@ -2005,8 +1998,20 @@ static void cpuset_propagate_hotplug_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
struct cpuset *cs = container_of(work, struct cpuset, hotplug_work);
bool is_empty;
+retry:
+ wait_event(cpuset_attach_wq, cs->attach_in_progress == 0);
+
mutex_lock(&cpuset_mutex);
+ /*
+ * We have raced with task attaching. We wait util attaching
+ * is finished, so we won't attach a task to an empty cpuset.
+ */
+ if (cs->attach_in_progress) {
+ mutex_unlock(&cpuset_mutex);
+ goto retry;
+ }
+
cpumask_andnot(&off_cpus, cs->cpus_allowed, top_cpuset.cpus_allowed);
nodes_andnot(off_mems, cs->mems_allowed, top_cpuset.mems_allowed);
--
1.8.0.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-09 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-09 9:14 [PATCH v3 0/7] cpuset: implement sane hierarchy behaviors Li Zefan
2013-06-09 9:14 ` Li Zefan [this message]
2013-06-09 9:14 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] cpuset: remove async hotplug propagation work Li Zefan
2013-06-09 15:47 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-09 9:15 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] cpuset: record old_mems_allowed in struct cpuset Li Zefan
2013-06-09 9:15 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] cpuset: introduce effective_{cpumask|nodemask}_cpuset() Li Zefan
2013-06-09 9:16 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] cpuset: allow to keep tasks in empty cpusets Li Zefan
2013-06-09 9:16 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] cpuset: allow to move tasks to " Li Zefan
2013-06-09 9:17 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] cpuset: fix to migrate mm correctly in a corner case Li Zefan
2013-06-09 15:49 ` Tejun Heo
2013-06-09 16:03 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] cpuset: implement sane hierarchy behaviors Tejun Heo
2013-06-13 7:04 ` Li Zefan
2013-06-13 17:49 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51B4476E.90202@huawei.com \
--to=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).