From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com>, mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, bp@alien8.de,
pjt@google.com, namhyung@kernel.org, efault@gmx.de,
morten.rasmussen@arm.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com, viresh.kumar@linaro.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mgorman@suse.de, riel@redhat.com,
wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC patch 0/4] change 64 bit variables to long type
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 10:20:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51B537E8.6010809@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1370590169-24804-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@intel.com>
On 06/07/2013 03:29 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
> There are some 64 bits variables in cfs_rq/tg etc. That ask expersive
> operations in 32 bit machine. But in fact, long type is enough for them.
>
> So do this change lead more efficient code and without data lose.
BTW, this patch bases on my v8 patchset: use runnable load in balance.
the git tree is here:
git@github.com:alexshi/power-scheduling.git runnablelb
Any more comments?
>
> Regards
> Alex
>
--
Thanks
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-10 2:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-07 7:29 [RFC patch 0/4] change 64 bit variables to long type Alex Shi
2013-06-07 7:29 ` [RFC patch 1/4] sched: change cfs_rq load avg to unsigned long Alex Shi
2013-06-07 9:07 ` Vincent Guittot
2013-06-08 2:18 ` Alex Shi
2013-06-17 9:49 ` Paul Turner
2013-06-17 9:59 ` Alex Shi
2013-06-17 9:54 ` Vincent Guittot
2013-06-17 9:58 ` Alex Shi
2013-06-18 4:56 ` Alex Shi
2013-06-07 7:29 ` [RFC patch 2/4] sched/tg: use 'unsigned long' for load variable in task group Alex Shi
2013-06-17 12:25 ` Paul Turner
2013-06-17 15:26 ` Alex Shi
2013-06-07 7:29 ` [RFC patch 3/4] sched/cfs_rq: change atomic64_t removed_load to atomic_long_t Alex Shi
2013-06-17 10:19 ` Paul Turner
2013-06-07 7:29 ` [RFC patch 4/4] sched/tg: remove tg.load_weight Alex Shi
2013-06-17 12:22 ` Paul Turner
2013-06-10 2:20 ` Alex Shi [this message]
2013-06-11 6:13 ` [RFC patch 0/4] change 64 bit variables to long type Alex Shi
2013-06-14 14:20 ` Alex Shi
2013-06-17 1:01 ` Alex Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51B537E8.6010809@intel.com \
--to=alex.shi@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=jason.low2@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox