From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751830Ab3FJHLc (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jun 2013 03:11:32 -0400 Received: from eu1sys200aog122.obsmtp.com ([207.126.144.153]:38725 "EHLO eu1sys200aog122.obsmtp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751511Ab3FJHLb (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jun 2013 03:11:31 -0400 Message-ID: <51B57BA0.3060702@st.com> Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 08:09:20 +0100 From: Srinivas KANDAGATLA Reply-To: srinivas.kandagatla@st.com Organization: STMicroelectronics User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130308 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lars-Peter Clausen Cc: Mark Brown , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] regmap: Add regmap_field APIs References: <1369753080-1929-1-git-send-email-srinivas.kandagatla@st.com> <51B4A693.4080503@metafoo.de> In-Reply-To: <51B4A693.4080503@metafoo.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 09/06/13 17:00, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > [...] >> +int regmap_field_write(struct regmap_field *field, unsigned int val) >> +{ >> + int field_bits; >> + unsigned int reg_mask; >> + field_bits = field->msb - field->lsb + 1; >> + reg_mask = ((BIT(field_bits) - 1) << field->lsb); >> + return regmap_update_bits(field->regmap, field->reg, >> + reg_mask, val << field->lsb); > > Considering that you'd do the same calculations over and over again it would > probably make more sense store the mask rather than the msb in the struct It makes sense, I will do that change. Thanks, srini > >> +} >> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(regmap_field_write);