From: Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de>
To: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH 4/9 RESEND] RFC: timekeeping: introduce flag systime_was_set
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 20:05:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51BB5B65.3000400@ahsoftware.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51BB55C0.7090603@linaro.org>
Am 14.06.2013 19:41, schrieb John Stultz:
> On 06/14/2013 09:52 AM, Alexander Holler wrote:
>> In order to let an RTC set the time at boot without the problem that a
>> second RTC overwrites it, the flag systime_was_set is introduced.
>>
>> systime_was_set will be true, if a persistent clock sets the time at
>> boot,
>> or if do_settimeofday() is called (e.g. by the RTC subsystem or
>> userspace).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexander Holler <holler@ahsoftware.de>
>> ---
>> include/linux/time.h | 6 ++++++
>> kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 10 +++++++++-
>> 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/time.h b/include/linux/time.h
>> index d5d229b..888280f 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/time.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/time.h
>> @@ -129,6 +129,12 @@ extern int update_persistent_clock(struct
>> timespec now);
>> void timekeeping_init(void);
>> extern int timekeeping_suspended;
>> +/*
>> + * Will be true if the system time was set at least once by
>> + * a persistent clock, RTC or userspace.
>> + */
>> +extern bool systime_was_set;
>> +
>
> Probably should make this static to timekeeping.c and create an accessor
> function so you don't have to export locking rules on this.
>
>
>> unsigned long get_seconds(void);
>> struct timespec current_kernel_time(void);
>> struct timespec __current_kernel_time(void); /* does not take
>> xtime_lock */
>> diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
>> index baeeb5c..07d8531 100644
>> --- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
>> +++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
>> @@ -37,6 +37,9 @@ int __read_mostly timekeeping_suspended;
>> /* Flag for if there is a persistent clock on this platform */
>> bool __read_mostly persistent_clock_exist = false;
>> +/* Flag for if the system time was set at least once */
>> +bool __read_mostly systime_was_set;
>> +
> Probably should also move this to be part of the timekeeper structure
> (since it will be protected by the timekeeper lock.
>
I wanted to avoid locks for this silly flag at all. It is only set once
at boot (and resume) and set to 0 at suspend. And I don't see any
possible race condition which could make a lock necessary. Therefor I've
decided to not use a lock or atomic_* in order to skip any delay in
setting the time.
Of course, I might be wrong and there might be a use case where multiple
things do set the system time concurrently and nothing else did set
system time before, but I found that extremly unlikely.
>> static inline void tk_normalize_xtime(struct timekeeper *tk)
>> {
>> while (tk->xtime_nsec >= ((u64)NSEC_PER_SEC << tk->shift)) {
>> @@ -498,6 +501,9 @@ int do_settimeofday(const struct timespec *tv)
>> raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&timekeeper_lock, flags);
>> write_seqcount_begin(&timekeeper_seq);
>> + systime_was_set = true;
>> +
>> +
>> timekeeping_forward_now(tk);
>> xt = tk_xtime(tk);
>
> Might also want to add the flag to inject_offset as well, since that
> could be used to set the time.
I wasn't sure about that because I had only a quick look at
inject_offset() and had the impression it's only able to inject a
relative small offset (so not usable at boot). And, as written sometimes
before, I haven't had a deep look at suspend/resume, which might be the
only place where it is really used to set the clock when
systime_was_set is false.
Regards,
Alexander
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-14 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 77+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-19 15:14 [PATCH 0/3] rtc: rtc-hid-sensor-time Alexander Holler
2013-04-19 15:14 ` [PATCH 1/3 RESEND] rtc: rtc-hid-sensor-time: allow full years (16bit) in HID reports Alexander Holler
2013-04-19 15:14 ` [PATCH 2/3] rtc: rtc-hid-sensor-time: allow 16 and 32 bit values for all attributes Alexander Holler
2013-04-19 15:14 ` [PATCH 3/3] rtc: rtc-hid-sensor-time; add option hctosys to set time at boot Alexander Holler
2013-04-22 23:38 ` Andrew Morton
2013-04-23 8:51 ` Alexander Holler
2013-04-23 10:08 ` Alexander Holler
2013-04-23 10:13 ` Alexander Holler
2013-04-23 10:17 ` Alexander Holler
2013-04-23 15:47 ` Alexander Holler
2013-04-24 21:14 ` Andrew Morton
2013-04-25 6:55 ` Alexander Holler
2013-05-05 11:21 ` [PATCH 0/4] rtc: rtc-hid-sensor-time: some changes Alexander Holler
2013-05-05 11:21 ` [PATCH 1/4] rtc: rtc-hid-sensor-time: allow full years (16bit) in HID reports Alexander Holler
2013-05-05 11:21 ` [PATCH 2/4] rtc: rtc-hid-sensor-time: allow 16 and 32 bit values for all attributes Alexander Holler
2013-05-05 11:21 ` [PATCH 3/4] rtc: rtc-hid-sensor-time: add option hctosys to set time at boot Alexander Holler
2013-05-21 21:42 ` Andrew Morton
2013-05-21 22:02 ` John Stultz
2013-05-21 23:15 ` Alexander Holler
2013-05-28 19:37 ` John Stultz
2013-05-29 4:42 ` Alexander Holler
2013-06-04 13:41 ` Alexander Holler
2013-06-05 17:15 ` [PATCH 0/3] RFC: timekeeping: rtc: change hctosys mechanism Alexander Holler
2013-06-05 17:15 ` [PATCH 1/3] RFC: timekeeping: introduce flag systime_was_set Alexander Holler
2013-06-05 17:15 ` [PATCH 2/3] RFC: timekeeping: rtc: Introduce new kernel parameter hctosys Alexander Holler
2013-06-05 17:15 ` [PATCH 3/3] RFC: timekeeping: rtc: remove CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS and RTC_HCTOSYS_DEVICE Alexander Holler
2013-06-06 10:51 ` [PATCH 0/3 v2] RFC: timekeeping: rtc: change hctosys mechanism Alexander Holler
2013-06-06 10:51 ` [PATCH 1/3 RESEND] RFC: timekeeping: introduce flag systime_was_set Alexander Holler
2013-06-06 10:51 ` [PATCH 2/3 v2] RFC: timekeeping: rtc: Introduce new kernel parameter hctosys Alexander Holler
2013-06-13 19:39 ` Alexander Holler
2013-06-14 16:52 ` [PATCH 0/9 v3] RFC: timekeeping: rtc: change hctosys mechanism Alexander Holler
2013-06-14 16:52 ` [PATCH 1/9 RESEND] rtc: rtc-hid-sensor-time: allow full years (16bit) in HID reports Alexander Holler
2013-06-14 16:52 ` [PATCH 2/9 RESEND] rtc: rtc-hid-sensor-time: allow 16 and 32 bit values for all attributes Alexander Holler
2013-06-14 16:52 ` [PATCH 3/9] rtc: rtc-hid-sensor-time: delay registering as rtc into a work Alexander Holler
2013-06-20 10:39 ` [PATCH 3/9 v2] " Alexander Holler
2013-06-26 19:55 ` Andrew Morton
2013-06-26 21:34 ` [rtc-linux] " Alexander Holler
2013-06-26 22:07 ` Greg KH
2013-06-26 23:51 ` Alexander Holler
2013-07-06 8:55 ` Alexander Holler
2013-07-06 18:21 ` Jiri Kosina
2013-07-07 7:35 ` Alexander Holler
2013-07-08 9:12 ` [PATCH 0/2] rtc: rtc-hid-sensor-time: enable HID input processing early Alexander Holler
2013-07-08 9:12 ` [PATCH 1/2] rtc: rtc-hid-sensor-time: improve error handling when rtc register fails Alexander Holler
2013-07-08 9:12 ` [PATCH 2/2] rtc: rtc-hid-sensor-time: enable HID input processing early Alexander Holler
2013-06-28 1:29 ` [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH 3/9 v2] rtc: rtc-hid-sensor-time: delay registering as rtc into a work Alexander Holler
2013-06-14 16:52 ` [PATCH 4/9 RESEND] RFC: timekeeping: introduce flag systime_was_set Alexander Holler
2013-06-14 17:41 ` John Stultz
2013-06-14 18:05 ` Alexander Holler [this message]
2013-06-14 18:28 ` [rtc-linux] " John Stultz
2013-06-15 6:01 ` Alexander Holler
2013-06-17 18:10 ` John Stultz
2013-06-20 10:15 ` Alexander Holler
2013-06-20 17:27 ` John Stultz
2013-06-20 18:45 ` Alexander Holler
2013-06-20 19:28 ` John Stultz
2013-06-20 23:10 ` Alexander Holler
2013-06-14 16:52 ` [PATCH 5/9 v3] RFC: timekeeping: rtc: Introduce new kernel parameter hctosys Alexander Holler
2013-06-14 19:24 ` John Stultz
2013-06-14 16:52 ` [PATCH 6/9 v3] RFC: timekeeping: rtc: remove CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS and RTC_HCTOSYS_DEVICE Alexander Holler
2013-06-14 19:11 ` John Stultz
2013-06-22 8:00 ` Alexander Holler
2013-06-14 16:52 ` [PATCH 7/9] RFC: rtc: implement rtc_read_timeval() Alexander Holler
2013-06-14 17:23 ` John Stultz
2013-06-14 17:43 ` Alexander Holler
2013-06-14 19:18 ` John Stultz
2013-06-14 17:28 ` John Stultz
2013-06-14 16:52 ` [PATCH 8/9] RFC: rtc: hctosys: support rtc_read_timeval() for high precision clocks Alexander Holler
2013-06-14 19:20 ` John Stultz
2013-06-14 16:52 ` [PATCH 9/9] RFC: rtc: rtc-hid-sensor-time: add support for rtc_read_timeval() Alexander Holler
2013-06-14 17:27 ` [PATCH 0/9 v3] RFC: timekeeping: rtc: change hctosys mechanism John Stultz
2013-06-06 10:51 ` [PATCH 3/3 v2] RFC: timekeeping: rtc: remove CONFIG_RTC_HCTOSYS and RTC_HCTOSYS_DEVICE Alexander Holler
2013-06-04 9:38 ` [PATCH] rtc: rtc-hid-sensor-time: fix possible bug on driver_remove Alexander Holler
2013-06-08 8:56 ` Alexander Holler
2013-05-05 11:21 ` [PATCH 4/4] rtc: rtc-hid-sensor-time: add support for milliseconds Alexander Holler
2013-04-20 23:46 ` [PATCH 0/3] rtc: rtc-hid-sensor-time Jiri Kosina
2013-04-21 6:38 ` Alexander Holler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51BB5B65.3000400@ahsoftware.de \
--to=holler@ahsoftware.de \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).