public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Wang <wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Lei Wen <leiwen@marvell.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
	mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: add heuristic logic to pick idle peers
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 11:27:15 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51BE8213.4000701@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1371435692-18831-1-git-send-email-leiwen@marvell.com>

Hi, Lei

On 06/17/2013 10:21 AM, Lei Wen wrote:
> nr_busy_cpus in sched_group_power structure cannot present the purpose
> for judging below statement:
> "this cpu's scheduler group has multiple busy cpu's exceeding
>  the group's power."
> 
> But only could tell how many cpus is doing their jobs for currently.

AFAIK, this nr_busy_cpus presents how many cpus in local group are not
idle, the logical here in nohz_kick_needed() is:

	if domain cpus share resources and at least 2 cpus in
	local group are not idle, prefer to do balance.

And the idea behind is, we catch the timing when there are idle-cpu and
busy-group and task-moving may cost low.

Your change will remove this timing for balance, I think you may need
some test to prove that this patch will make things better.

Regards,
Michael Wang

> 
> However, the original purpose to add this logic still looks good.
> So we move this kind of logic to find_new_ilb, so that we could pick
> out peer from our sharing resource domain whenever possible.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lei Wen <leiwen@marvell.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/fair.c |   28 ++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index c61a614..64f9120 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -5368,10 +5368,31 @@ static struct {
>  	unsigned long next_balance;     /* in jiffy units */
>  } nohz ____cacheline_aligned;
> 
> +/*
> + * Add the heuristic logic to try waking up idle cpu from
> + * those peers who share resources with us, so that the
> + * cost would be brought to minimum.
> + */
>  static inline int find_new_ilb(int call_cpu)
>  {
> -	int ilb = cpumask_first(nohz.idle_cpus_mask);
> +	int ilb = nr_cpu_ids;
> +	struct sched_domain *sd;
> +
> +	rcu_read_lock();
> +	for_each_domain(call_cpu, sd) {
> +		/* We loop till sched_domain no longer share resource */
> +		if (!(sd->flags & SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES)) {
> +			ilb = cpumask_first(nohz.idle_cpus_mask);
> +			break;
> +		}
> 
> +		/* else, we would try to pick the idle cpu from peers first */
> +		ilb = cpumask_first_and(nohz.idle_cpus_mask,
> +				sched_domain_span(sd));
> +		if (ilb < nr_cpu_ids)
> +			break;
> +	}
> +	rcu_read_unlock();
>  	if (ilb < nr_cpu_ids && idle_cpu(ilb))
>  		return ilb;
> 
> @@ -5620,8 +5641,6 @@ end:
>   * Current heuristic for kicking the idle load balancer in the presence
>   * of an idle cpu is the system.
>   *   - This rq has more than one task.
> - *   - At any scheduler domain level, this cpu's scheduler group has multiple
> - *     busy cpu's exceeding the group's power.
>   *   - For SD_ASYM_PACKING, if the lower numbered cpu's in the scheduler
>   *     domain span are idle.
>   */
> @@ -5659,9 +5678,6 @@ static inline int nohz_kick_needed(struct rq *rq, int cpu)
>  		struct sched_group_power *sgp = sg->sgp;
>  		int nr_busy = atomic_read(&sgp->nr_busy_cpus);
> 
> -		if (sd->flags & SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES && nr_busy > 1)
> -			goto need_kick_unlock;
> -
>  		if (sd->flags & SD_ASYM_PACKING && nr_busy != sg->group_weight
>  		    && (cpumask_first_and(nohz.idle_cpus_mask,
>  					  sched_domain_span(sd)) < cpu))
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-17  3:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-17  2:21 [PATCH] sched: add heuristic logic to pick idle peers Lei Wen
2013-06-17  3:27 ` Michael Wang [this message]
2013-06-17  5:08   ` Lei Wen
2013-06-17  6:44     ` Michael Wang
2013-06-17 12:29       ` Lei Wen
2013-06-23  9:29       ` Lei Wen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51BE8213.4000701@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=wangyun@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=leiwen@marvell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox