From: "zhangwei(Jovi)" <jovi.zhangwei@huawei.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] tracing/kprobes: Avoid perf_trace_buf_*() if ->perf_events is empty
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 11:41:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51BE857A.1080505@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130616172146.GA8533@redhat.com>
On 2013/6/17 1:21, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> perf_trace_buf_prepare() + perf_trace_buf_submit() make no sense
> if this task/CPU has no active counters. Change kprobe_perf_func()
> and kretprobe_perf_func() to check call->perf_events beforehand
> and return if this list is empty.
>
> For example, "perf record -e some_probe -p1". Only /sbin/init will
> report, all other threads which hit the same probe will do
> perf_trace_buf_prepare/perf_trace_buf_submit just to realize that
> nobody wants perf_swevent_event().
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Good point, I think we also need to change other places in below patch.
After applied the patch, perf_tp_event() function call reduced a lots
when using task based perf tracing.
-----------------------------------
tracing: Avoid perf_trace_buf_*() if ->perf_events is empty
Signed-off-by: zhangwei(Jovi) <jovi.zhangwei@huawei.com>
---
include/trace/ftrace.h | 5 ++++-
kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c | 10 ++++++++--
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/trace/ftrace.h b/include/trace/ftrace.h
index 19edd7f..5d340f5 100644
--- a/include/trace/ftrace.h
+++ b/include/trace/ftrace.h
@@ -659,6 +659,10 @@ perf_trace_##call(void *__data, proto) \
int __data_size; \
int rctx; \
\
+ head = this_cpu_ptr(event_call->perf_events); \
+ if (hlist_empty(head)) \
+ return; \
+ \
perf_fetch_caller_regs(&__regs); \
\
__data_size = ftrace_get_offsets_##call(&__data_offsets, args); \
@@ -679,7 +683,6 @@ perf_trace_##call(void *__data, proto) \
\
{ assign; } \
\
- head = this_cpu_ptr(event_call->perf_events); \
perf_trace_buf_submit(entry, __entry_size, rctx, __addr, \
__count, &__regs, head, __task); \
}
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c b/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c
index 8f2ac73..28debf4 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_syscalls.c
@@ -553,6 +553,10 @@ static void perf_syscall_enter(void *ignore, struct pt_regs *regs, long id)
if (!sys_data)
return;
+ head = this_cpu_ptr(sys_data->enter_event->perf_events);
+ if (hlist_empty(head))
+ return;
+
/* get the size after alignment with the u32 buffer size field */
size = sizeof(unsigned long) * sys_data->nb_args + sizeof(*rec);
size = ALIGN(size + sizeof(u32), sizeof(u64));
@@ -571,7 +575,6 @@ static void perf_syscall_enter(void *ignore, struct pt_regs *regs, long id)
syscall_get_arguments(current, regs, 0, sys_data->nb_args,
(unsigned long *)&rec->args);
- head = this_cpu_ptr(sys_data->enter_event->perf_events);
perf_trace_buf_submit(rec, size, rctx, 0, 1, regs, head, NULL);
}
@@ -629,6 +632,10 @@ static void perf_syscall_exit(void *ignore, struct pt_regs *regs, long ret)
if (!sys_data)
return;
+ head = this_cpu_ptr(sys_data->exit_event->perf_events);
+ if (hlist_empty(head))
+ return;
+
/* We can probably do that at build time */
size = ALIGN(sizeof(*rec) + sizeof(u32), sizeof(u64));
size -= sizeof(u32);
@@ -649,7 +656,6 @@ static void perf_syscall_exit(void *ignore, struct pt_regs *regs, long ret)
rec->nr = syscall_nr;
rec->ret = syscall_get_return_value(current, regs);
- head = this_cpu_ptr(sys_data->exit_event->perf_events);
perf_trace_buf_submit(rec, size, rctx, 0, 1, regs, head, NULL);
}
--
1.7.9.7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-17 3:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-16 17:21 [PATCH 0/3] tracing/kprobes: trace_probe->files cleanups Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-16 17:21 ` [PATCH 1/3] tracing/kprobes: Avoid perf_trace_buf_*() if ->perf_events is empty Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-17 3:41 ` zhangwei(Jovi) [this message]
2013-06-17 13:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-17 4:33 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-06-16 17:21 ` [PATCH 2/3] tracing/kprobes: Kill probe_enable_lock Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-17 4:59 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-06-17 15:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-18 2:49 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-06-18 3:41 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-06-18 19:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-19 20:30 ` [PATCH v2 " Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-19 20:34 ` [PATCH] tracing/kprobes: Don't pass addr=ip to perf_trace_buf_submit() Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-20 3:54 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-06-20 3:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] tracing/kprobes: Kill probe_enable_lock Masami Hiramatsu
2013-06-16 17:21 ` [PATCH 3/3] tracing/kprobes: Turn trace_probe->files into list_head Oleg Nesterov
2013-06-17 6:20 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-06-17 15:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51BE857A.1080505@huawei.com \
--to=jovi.zhangwei@huawei.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox