From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] kernel/timer.c: using spin_lock_irqsave instead of spin_lock + local_irq_save, especially when CONFIG_LOCKDEP not defined
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:59:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C11E83.8030902@asianux.com> (raw)
When CONFIG_LOCKDEP is not defined, spin_lock_irqsave() is not equal to
spin_lock() + local_irq_save().
In __mod_timer(), After call spin_lock_irqsave() with 'base->lock' in
lock_timer_base(), it may use spin_lock() with the 'new_base->lock'.
It may let original call do_raw_spin_lock_flags() with 'base->lock',
but new call LOCK_CONTENDED() with 'new_base->lock'.
In fact, we need both of them call do_raw_spin_lock_flags(), so use
spin_lock_irqsave() instead of spin_lock() + local_irq_save().
Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
---
kernel/timer.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/timer.c b/kernel/timer.c
index aa8b964..2550a62 100644
--- a/kernel/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/timer.c
@@ -754,9 +754,9 @@ __mod_timer(struct timer_list *timer, unsigned long expires,
if (likely(base->running_timer != timer)) {
/* See the comment in lock_timer_base() */
timer_set_base(timer, NULL);
- spin_unlock(&base->lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&base->lock, flags);
base = new_base;
- spin_lock(&base->lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&base->lock, flags);
timer_set_base(timer, base);
}
}
--
1.7.7.6
next reply other threads:[~2013-06-19 3:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-19 2:59 Chen Gang [this message]
2013-06-19 8:41 ` [PATCH] kernel/timer.c: using spin_lock_irqsave instead of spin_lock + local_irq_save, especially when CONFIG_LOCKDEP not defined Thomas Gleixner
2013-06-19 9:42 ` Chen Gang
2013-06-19 9:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-06-19 10:07 ` Chen Gang
2013-06-19 10:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-06-20 4:14 ` Chen Gang
2013-06-20 7:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-06-20 8:42 ` Chen Gang
2013-06-20 9:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-06-20 10:31 ` Chen Gang
2013-06-19 10:21 ` Chen Gang
2013-06-19 10:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-06-20 8:37 ` Chen Gang
2013-06-20 9:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-06-20 9:53 ` Chen Gang
2013-06-20 10:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-06-20 10:59 ` Chen Gang
2013-06-20 9:12 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51C11E83.8030902@asianux.com \
--to=gang.chen@asianux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox