From: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
To: <balbi@ti.com>
Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] i2c: omap: handle all irqs befor unblocking omap_i2c_xfer_msg()
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 21:43:04 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C1FBB8.4090600@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130607190543.GD15295@arwen.pp.htv.fi>
Hi Felipe,
On 06/07/2013 10:05 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 09:46:06PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> ARDY|NACK and ARDY|AL are set together in OMAP_I2C_STAT_REG, which will be
> Have you seen that happen ever ? AL is Arbitration Lost, we never put
> OMAP in a multi-master environment before.
This is an example from real life:
[ 0.271942] omap_i2c omap_i2c.1: bus 1 rev2.4.0 at 400 kHz
[ 1.283416] omap_i2c omap_i2c.1: timeout waiting for bus ready
[ 1.300109] OMAP_I2C DEBUG: stat=1001
[ 1.300140] omap_i2c omap_i2c.1: Arbitration lost
[ 1.300140] OMAP_I2C DEBUG: IE=601F
[ 1.300140] OMAP_I2C DEBUG: STAT=1000
[ 1.300170] OMAP_I2C DEBUG: IV=636F
[ 1.300170] OMAP_I2C DEBUG: WE=636F
[ 1.300170] OMAP_I2C DEBUG: SYSS=1
[ 1.300170] OMAP_I2C DEBUG: BUF=707
[ 1.300201] OMAP_I2C DEBUG: CNT=1
[ 1.300201] OMAP_I2C DEBUG: DATA=1
[ 1.300201] OMAP_I2C DEBUG: SYSC=215
[ 1.300201] OMAP_I2C DEBUG: CON=8200
[ 1.300231] OMAP_I2C DEBUG: OA=0
[ 1.300231] OMAP_I2C DEBUG: SA=49
[ 1.300231] OMAP_I2C DEBUG: PSC=9
[ 1.300262] OMAP_I2C DEBUG: SCLL=9
[ 1.300262] OMAP_I2C DEBUG: SCLH=3
[ 1.300262] OMAP_I2C DEBUG: SYSTEST=1E0
[ 1.300262] OMAP_I2C DEBUG: BUFSTAT=4000
and my headache now :..(
>
> ARDY | NACK I also find it a bit hard for those two to happen together
> since ARDY will be set when you can change controller's register
> *again*, mening that a transfer has completed.
There are examples:
[ 3.544952] omap_i2c 48060000.i2c: IRQ (ISR = 0x0006)
[ 25.574523] omap_i2c 48350000.i2c: IRQ (ISR = 0x0014)
[ 25.579925] omap_i2c 48350000.i2c: IRQ (ISR = 0x0012)
to see it - enable debug output in omap_i2c_isr_thread:
dev_dbg(dev->dev, "IRQ (ISR = 0x%04x)\n", stat);
>
> Also, we need to follow what the programming model says. And, I don't
> have docs with me right now, but IIRC it tells us to bail out if any of
> the error conditions are met.
>
yep, but first of all - all IRQs need to be acked before exit.
Sorry, for delayed reply - I've had problems with my e-mail.
- grygorii
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-19 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-07 18:46 [PATCH 0/5] v3.10-rc4: fix OMAP4 boot failure if CONFIG_SENSORS_LM75=y Grygorii Strashko
2013-06-07 18:46 ` [PATCH 1/5] i2c: omap: fix spurious IRQs: disable/enable IRQ at INTC when idle Grygorii Strashko
2013-06-07 20:51 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-06-19 18:35 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-06-19 19:31 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-06-19 20:01 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-06-19 20:56 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-06-07 18:46 ` [PATCH 2/5] i2c: omap: add runtime check in isr to be sure that i2c is enabled Grygorii Strashko
2013-06-07 19:02 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-06-19 18:42 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-06-19 19:39 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-06-07 18:46 ` [PATCH 3/5] i2c: omap: handle all irqs befor unblocking omap_i2c_xfer_msg() Grygorii Strashko
2013-06-07 19:05 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-06-19 18:43 ` Grygorii Strashko [this message]
2013-06-19 19:44 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-06-07 18:46 ` [PATCH 4/5] i2c: omap: query STP always when NACK is received Grygorii Strashko
2013-06-07 19:07 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-06-07 18:46 ` [PATCH 5/5] i2c: omap: remove omap_i2c_isr() hw irq handler Grygorii Strashko
2013-06-07 19:07 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-06-19 18:43 ` Grygorii Strashko
2013-06-19 19:44 ` Felipe Balbi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51C1FBB8.4090600@ti.com \
--to=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox