public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel: timer: looping issue, need reset variable 'found'
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 16:26:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C2BCB3.4060603@asianux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1306200944530.4013@ionos.tec.linutronix.de>

On 06/20/2013 03:47 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Jun 2013, Chen Gang wrote:
>> > On 06/10/2013 10:12 PM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> > I think we can treat original implementation as for speed optimization,
>> > so our discussion is "whether this speed optimization has effect with
>> > correctness".
> Then I recommend that you to sit down and analyze the correctness of
> the code.

That is only your recommend, not mean I have duty to.

> 
> Come back when you have a proof of the code being wrong. And by proof
> I mean factual proof not just handwaving theories.


At least before say so, please reply:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
If we assume "If there is nothing in tv2 which might come before the
found timer, then any timer in tv3 will ..." is correct.

When we found a timer in 'tv1', we will not search all timers in 'tv2'
(we only search first looping of tv2 for the specific 'slot').

Is it still OK ?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------


If you do not want to discuss with others, better quite politely, not
need judging or checking others, it is useless for the cooperation with
each other, is it right ?  ;-)


Thanks.
-- 
Chen Gang

Asianux Corporation

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-20  8:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-09 15:49 [PATCH] kernel: timer: looping issue, need reset variable 'found' Chen Gang
2013-06-10 14:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-06-13  3:39   ` Chen Gang
2013-06-18  3:28     ` Chen Gang
2013-06-18 10:42   ` Chen Gang
2013-06-20  7:47     ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-06-20  8:26       ` Chen Gang [this message]
2013-06-20  9:13         ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-06-20 10:20           ` Chen Gang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51C2BCB3.4060603@asianux.com \
    --to=gang.chen@asianux.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox