From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2] kernel/itimer.c: beautify code, not need check 'value', so save one instruction, simpler and easier for readers.
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 19:26:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C2E6F9.80107@asianux.com> (raw)
Since copy_to_user() will check 'value', we do not need check it outside
again, so can save one comparing instruction at least.
Also can let code simpler and easier for readers: if checking parameter
'value', it will easily lead readers to think about why not return
-EINVAL instead of -EFAULT, when checking parameter failed.
Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
---
kernel/itimer.c | 13 ++++++-------
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/itimer.c b/kernel/itimer.c
index 8d262b4..3b12271 100644
--- a/kernel/itimer.c
+++ b/kernel/itimer.c
@@ -102,15 +102,14 @@ int do_getitimer(int which, struct itimerval *value)
SYSCALL_DEFINE2(getitimer, int, which, struct itimerval __user *, value)
{
- int error = -EFAULT;
+ int error;
struct itimerval get_buffer;
- if (value) {
- error = do_getitimer(which, &get_buffer);
- if (!error &&
- copy_to_user(value, &get_buffer, sizeof(get_buffer)))
- error = -EFAULT;
- }
+ error = do_getitimer(which, &get_buffer);
+ if (!error &&
+ copy_to_user(value, &get_buffer, sizeof(get_buffer)))
+ error = -EFAULT;
+
return error;
}
--
1.7.7.6
next reply other threads:[~2013-06-20 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-20 11:26 Chen Gang [this message]
2013-06-20 12:02 ` [PATCH v2] kernel/itimer.c: beautify code, not need check 'value', so save one instruction, simpler and easier for readers Chen Gang
2013-06-20 12:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-06-21 1:24 ` Chen Gang
2013-06-20 13:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-06-21 2:04 ` Chen Gang
2013-06-21 10:31 ` [PATCH v3] kernel/itimer.c: remove the checking 'value' statement Chen Gang
2013-06-24 23:28 ` [PATCH v2] kernel/itimer.c: beautify code, not need check 'value', so save one instruction, simpler and easier for readers.t Thomas Gleixner
2013-06-25 0:58 ` Chen Gang
2013-06-25 1:16 ` [PATH v4] itimers: Remove bogus NULL pointer check in sys_getitimer() Chen Gang
2013-07-05 1:28 ` Chen Gang
2013-07-22 2:45 ` Chen Gang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51C2E6F9.80107@asianux.com \
--to=gang.chen@asianux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox