From: Dave Chiluk <chiluk@canonical.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Scheduler accounting inflated for io bound processes.
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 14:46:13 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C35C05.1070005@canonical.com> (raw)
Running the below testcase shows each process consuming 41-43% of it's
respective cpu while per core idle numbers show 63-65%, a disparity of
roughly 4-8%. Is this a bug, known behaviour, or consequence of the
process being io bound?
1. run sudo taskset -c 0 netserver
2. run taskset -c 1 netperf -H localhost -l 3600 -t TCP_RR & (start
netperf with priority on cpu1)
3. run top, press 1 for multiple CPUs to be separated
The below output is the top output notice the cpu0 idle at 67% when the
processes claim 42% usage a roughly 9% discrepancy.
------------------------------------------------
top - 19:27:38 up 4:08, 2 users, load average: 0.45, 0.19, 0.13
Tasks: 85 total, 2 running, 83 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
%Cpu0 : 0.8 us, 15.4 sy, 0.0 ni, 66.7 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 17.1 si,
0.0 st
%Cpu1 : 0.8 us, 17.3 sy, 0.0 ni, 63.1 id, 0.0 wa, 0.0 hi, 18.8 si,
0.0 st
KiB Mem: 4049180 total, 252952 used, 3796228 free, 23108 buffers
KiB Swap: 0 total, 0 used, 0 free, 132932 cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
6150 root 20 0 9756 700 536 R 42.6 0.0 0:48.90 netserver
6149 ubuntu 20 0 11848 1056 852 S 42.2 0.0 0:48.92 netperf
------------------------------------------------
The above testcase was run on 3.10-rc6.
So is this a bug or can someone explain to me why this isn't a bug?
The related ubuntu bug is
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1193073
next reply other threads:[~2013-06-20 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-20 19:46 Dave Chiluk [this message]
2013-06-25 16:01 ` Scheduler accounting inflated for io bound processes Mike Galbraith
2013-06-25 17:48 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-06-26 9:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-06-26 10:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-06-26 15:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-06-26 16:01 ` Mike Galbraith
2013-06-26 16:04 ` David Ahern
2013-06-26 16:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2013-06-26 16:13 ` David Ahern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51C35C05.1070005@canonical.com \
--to=chiluk@canonical.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox