From: Mark Jackson <mpfj-list@newflow.co.uk>
To: "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 3.10.0-rc4: jffs2: Possible circular locking dependency detected
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 13:58:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C44DE3.3000202@newflow.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51C2FC56.1070808@newflow.co.uk>
On 20/06/13 13:57, Mark Jackson wrote:
> Just mounted a JFFS2 partition (held in NOR flash on a custom AM335x
> CPU board), and I always get the following:-
>
> [ 3.864244]
> [ 3.865851] ======================================================
> [ 3.872359] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
> [ 3.878968] 3.10.0-rc4-00172-gf31c62e-dirty #249 Not tainted
> [ 3.884926] -------------------------------------------------------
> [ 3.891526] rcS/507 is trying to acquire lock:
> [ 3.896206] (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}, at: [<c00b42c8>] might_fault+0x3c/0x94
> [ 3.903684]
> [ 3.903684] but task is already holding lock:
> [ 3.909826] (&f->sem){+.+.+.}, at: [<c016f208>] jffs2_readdir+0x40/0x1b0
> [ 3.917021]
> [ 3.917021] which lock already depends on the new lock.
Looks like I reported something similar earlier this year:-
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mtd/2013-February/045888.html
And I also found this going back to 3.0.18:-
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-rt-users/msg07617.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-21 12:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-20 12:57 3.10.0-rc4: jffs2: Possible circular locking dependency detected Mark Jackson
2013-06-21 12:58 ` Mark Jackson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51C44DE3.3000202@newflow.co.uk \
--to=mpfj-list@newflow.co.uk \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox