Re: [PATCH 2/2] regulator: palmas: model SMPS10 as two regulators

[Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>]

On Friday 21 June 2013 06:55 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> On Thursday 20 June 2013 08:56 PM, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Thursday 20 June 2013 08:14 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>>>
>>> Have you added the regulator supply entries?
>>> Are you testing on mainline linux-next?
>> Not in linux-next :-( Tested only with mainline.
>> Does inverting the order helps?
>>
>
> I think because you do not have entry of supply in your dt node, it gets
> ignored by regulator_dev_lookup() and continue.
>
> I made the entry like (added entry form smps10-out2-supply and smps10-in-supply
> in dt node) and then it failed.
> /***
>
> +                           smps10-out2-supply = <&palmas_smps10_out2_reg>;
> +                           smps10-in-supply = <&tps65090_dcdc3_reg>;
>                              ldo3-in-supply = <&palmas_smps3_reg>;
> @@ -903,6 +905,20 @@
>                                          regulator-always-on;
>                                  };
>
> +                               palmas_smps10_out1_reg: smps10_out1 {
> +                                       regulator-name = "smps10_out1";
> +                                       regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
> +                                       regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
> +                                       regulator-always-on;
> +                               };
> +
> +                               palmas_smps10_out2_reg: smps10_out2 {
> +                                       regulator-name = "smps10_out2";
> +                                       regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
> +                                       regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
> +                                       regulator-always-on;
> +                               };
> +
> **/
>
>
> After reversing the sequence, it worked fine.

You mean, changing the order in dt node helped?

Thanks
Kishon