public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATH v4] itimers: Remove bogus NULL pointer check in sys_getitimer()
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 09:16:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C8EF6F.4050803@asianux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51C8EB41.6060501@asianux.com>

People might be tricked into assuming that the return value for a
failed NULL pointer check should be -EINVAL instead of -EFAULT.

Remove the misleading NULL pointer check to fix this nuisance.

Aside of that this patch fixes the problem of NOMMU kernels, where
a NULL pointer dereference is a valid operation. This allows to
boot NOMMU kernels without working around the shortcomings of the
getitimer() system call, which have been ignored since this NULL
pointer check was introduced in Linux 0.96a.

Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
---
 kernel/itimer.c |   13 ++++++-------
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/itimer.c b/kernel/itimer.c
index 8d262b4..3b12271 100644
--- a/kernel/itimer.c
+++ b/kernel/itimer.c
@@ -102,15 +102,14 @@ int do_getitimer(int which, struct itimerval *value)
 
 SYSCALL_DEFINE2(getitimer, int, which, struct itimerval __user *, value)
 {
-	int error = -EFAULT;
+	int error;
 	struct itimerval get_buffer;
 
-	if (value) {
-		error = do_getitimer(which, &get_buffer);
-		if (!error &&
-		    copy_to_user(value, &get_buffer, sizeof(get_buffer)))
-			error = -EFAULT;
-	}
+	error = do_getitimer(which, &get_buffer);
+	if (!error &&
+	    copy_to_user(value, &get_buffer, sizeof(get_buffer)))
+		error = -EFAULT;
+
 	return error;
 }
 
-- 
1.7.7.6




  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-25  1:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-20 11:26 [PATCH v2] kernel/itimer.c: beautify code, not need check 'value', so save one instruction, simpler and easier for readers Chen Gang
2013-06-20 12:02 ` Chen Gang
2013-06-20 12:55   ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-06-21  1:24     ` Chen Gang
2013-06-20 13:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2013-06-21  2:04   ` Chen Gang
2013-06-21 10:31     ` [PATCH v3] kernel/itimer.c: remove the checking 'value' statement Chen Gang
2013-06-24 23:28     ` [PATCH v2] kernel/itimer.c: beautify code, not need check 'value', so save one instruction, simpler and easier for readers.t Thomas Gleixner
2013-06-25  0:58       ` Chen Gang
2013-06-25  1:16         ` Chen Gang [this message]
2013-07-05  1:28           ` [PATH v4] itimers: Remove bogus NULL pointer check in sys_getitimer() Chen Gang
2013-07-22  2:45             ` Chen Gang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51C8EF6F.4050803@asianux.com \
    --to=gang.chen@asianux.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox