[PATCH 1/2] tracing/kprobes: move free_trace_probe into unregister_trace_probe

["zhangwei(Jovi)" <jovi.zhangwei@huawei.com>]

There have no good reason to call free_trace_probe
every time when unregister_trace_probe return 0.

Move free_trace_probe into unregister_trace_probe,
make code simpler.

Signed-off-by: zhangwei(Jovi) <jovi.zhangwei@huawei.com>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c |    5 +----
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
index 9f46e98..f193c38 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_kprobe.c
@@ -401,6 +401,7 @@ static int unregister_trace_probe(struct trace_probe *tp)
 	__unregister_trace_probe(tp);
 	list_del(&tp->list);
 	unregister_probe_event(tp);
+	free_trace_probe(tp);

 	return 0;
 }
@@ -419,7 +420,6 @@ static int register_trace_probe(struct trace_probe *tp)
 		ret = unregister_trace_probe(old_tp);
 		if (ret < 0)
 			goto end;
-		free_trace_probe(old_tp);
 	}

 	/* Register new event */
@@ -550,8 +550,6 @@ static int create_trace_probe(int argc, char **argv)
 		}
 		/* delete an event */
 		ret = unregister_trace_probe(tp);
-		if (ret == 0)
-			free_trace_probe(tp);
 		mutex_unlock(&probe_lock);
 		return ret;
 	}
@@ -680,7 +678,6 @@ static int release_all_trace_probes(void)
 	while (!list_empty(&probe_list)) {
 		tp = list_entry(probe_list.next, struct trace_probe, list);
 		unregister_trace_probe(tp);
-		free_trace_probe(tp);
 	}

 end:
-- 
1.7.9.7