From: Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@linux.intel.com>
To: yaniv saar <yaniv.mellanox@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@intel.com>,
e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>,
Eric Dumazet <erdnetdev@gmail.com>,
Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, HPA <hpa@zytor.com>,
Eilon Greenstien <eilong@broadcom.com>,
Or Gerlitz <or.gerlitz@gmail.com>,
Amir Vadai <amirv@mellanox.com>,
Alex Rosenbaum <alexr@mellanox.com>,
Eliezer Tamir <eliezer@tamir.org.il>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] net: lls epoll support
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 18:34:36 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51C9B88C.1080401@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALuTh9E5CvV1sfjMJRs7mWwfTm2HpaFFMJWEP10sbSpA8qBMsg@mail.gmail.com>
On 25/06/2013 17:26, yaniv saar wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Eliezer Tamir
> <eliezer.tamir@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> [this patch needs the poll patch to be applied first]
>> with sockperf doing epoll on 1000 sockets I see an avg latency of 6us
>>
>
> hi eliezer,
>
> please consider the following solution for epoll that is based on
> polling dev+queue.
> instead of looping over the socket as in LLS, maintain in eventpool
> struct a list of device+queues (qdlist).
Thanks for looking into this.
I'm currently working on a solution that has a lot similar to what you
are proposing.
We don't need a new id mechanism, we already have the napi_id.
The nice thing about the napi_id is that the only locking it needs
is an rcu_read_lock when dereferencing.
we don't need to remember the ll_usec value of each socket because
the patch for select/poll (currently waiting for review) added
a separate sysctl value for poll.
I would like to find a way for the user to specify how long to busy
wait, directly from the system call, but I was not able to find
a simple way of adding this without a change to the system call
prototype.
we do however need to track when a socket's napi_id changes.
But for that we can hook into sk_mark_ll().
so here is a list of proposed changes:
1. add a linked list of unique napi_id's to struct eventpoll.
each id will have a collision list of sockets that have the same id.
-a hash is gratuitous, we expect the unique list to have 0 to 2
elements in most cases.
2. when a new socket is added, if its id is new it gets added to the
unique list, otherwise to the collision list of that id.
3. when a socket is removed, if it's on the unique list, replace it
with the first on its former collision list.
4. add callback mechanism to sk_mark_ll() which will be activated when
the mark changes, update the lists.
(a socket may be polled by more than one epoll so be careful)
5. add and remove to/from the lists in ep_insert and ep_remove
respectively. check if we need to do something for ep_modify().
6. add an ep_poll helper that will round robin polling on the
files in the unique list.
7. init everything from epoll_create.
locking:
napi_id's are great since they don't need locking except for an
rcu_read_lock when polling on one.
the lists need a spinlock for adding/removing, maybe they
can use ep->lock.
callback registration/removal needs to use the same mechanism that
ep_add / ep_remove use to protect themselves from the rest of epoll.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-25 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-19 10:04 [PATCH v3 net-next 0/1] net: lls select poll support Eliezer Tamir
2013-06-19 10:04 ` [PATCH v3 net-next] net: poll/select low latency socket support Eliezer Tamir
2013-06-19 11:42 ` [PATCH RFC] net: lls epoll support Eliezer Tamir
2013-06-25 14:26 ` yaniv saar
2013-06-25 15:34 ` Eliezer Tamir [this message]
2013-06-19 12:13 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 0/1] net: lls select poll support Eric Dumazet
2013-06-24 1:44 ` David Miller
2013-06-24 4:23 ` Eliezer Tamir
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51C9B88C.1080401@linux.intel.com \
--to=eliezer.tamir@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexr@mellanox.com \
--cc=amirv@mellanox.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=donald.c.skidmore@intel.com \
--cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=eilong@broadcom.com \
--cc=eliezer@tamir.org.il \
--cc=erdnetdev@gmail.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=or.gerlitz@gmail.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=yaniv.mellanox@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).