From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754484Ab3F0UM7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2013 16:12:59 -0400 Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]:60602 "EHLO arroyo.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754342Ab3F0T4u (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jun 2013 15:56:50 -0400 Message-ID: <51CC98E6.1020104@ti.com> Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 14:56:22 -0500 From: Nishanth Menon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Luciano Coelho CC: , , , , lkml , , Tony Lindgren , linux-omap , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation: dt: bindings: TI WiLink modules References: <1372149330-24335-1-git-send-email-coelho@ti.com> <51CBC1C8.1040301@gmail.com> <1372322851.18889.53.camel@cumari.coelho.fi> <20130627125131.GA27285@kahuna> <1372337887.8383.12.camel@cumari.coelho.fi> <1372339148.8383.17.camel@cumari.coelho.fi> <51CC3CEE.3050004@ti.com> <1372339810.8383.20.camel@cumari.coelho.fi> <1372359090.21065.12.camel@cumari.coelho.fi> <51CC8E80.5030206@ti.com> <1372362418.21065.25.camel@cumari.coelho.fi> In-Reply-To: <1372362418.21065.25.camel@cumari.coelho.fi> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 06/27/2013 02:46 PM, Luciano Coelho wrote: > On Thu, 2013-06-27 at 14:12 -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote: [...] >> Indexes to another entity is always a maintenance burden in the longer >> run and needs judicious control. If it is possible to avoid it by >> selecting the right parameters, I am a hard advocate for the same. > > I tend to agree. But you need a balance. In theory you're right. But > I think if you take the real world example, it is over-engineering. > > Anyway, if you *really* think this needs to be changed, I think we're in > a deadlock here and I'd like to hear other people's opinions. I don't > mind making the change, but I'm still not convinced it is worth it, > since it just adds complexity. > > And hey, this is too much bikeshedding for such a small detail. Lol :) Alrite, if no one else is complaining, I am not going to block it either. -- Regards, Nishanth Menon