From: Dong Fang <yp.fangdong@gmail.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: remove the unnecessrary code of fs/inode.c
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 02:22:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51D2719D.8040802@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51D26F16.4040803@gmail.com>
On 07/02/2013 02:11 AM, Dong Fang wrote:
> On 07/02/2013 12:41 AM, Al Viro wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 08:19:03AM -0400, Dong Fang wrote:
>>> These functions, such as find_inode_fast() and find_inode(),
>>> iget_lock() and
>>> iget5_lock(), insert_inode_locked() and insert_inode_locked4(),
>>> almost have
>>> the same code.
>>
>> NAK. These functions exist exactly because the variant with callbacks
>> costs more. We walk the hash chain and for each inode on it your
>> variant would result in
>> * call
>> * fetching ino from memory
>> * comparison (and storing result in general-purpose register)
>> * return
>> * checking that register and branch on the result of that check
>> What's more, the whole thing's not fun for branch predictor.
>>
>> It is a hot enough path to warrant a special-cased variant; if we can't
>> get away with that, we use the variants with callbacks, but on
>> filesystems
>> where ->i_ino is sufficient as search key we really want to avoid the
>> overhead.
>>
>
> that's right, i didn't think of it, but i think may be we can remove
> the deduplicate codes of iget_lock() and iget5_lock() function, right?
>
> if ok, i will send a new patch later. :)
>
> thx Viro.
Viro, regard this :)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-02 6:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-01 12:19 [PATCH] vfs: remove the unnecessrary code of fs/inode.c Dong Fang
2013-07-02 4:15 ` Gu Zheng
2013-07-02 6:00 ` Dong Fang
2013-07-02 4:41 ` Al Viro
2013-07-02 6:11 ` Dong Fang
2013-07-02 6:22 ` Dong Fang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51D2719D.8040802@gmail.com \
--to=yp.fangdong@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox