From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 06/15] perf tools: fix parse_events_terms() freeing local variable on error path
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 09:26:08 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51D27280.30007@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51D1CE93.7070804@gmail.com>
On 01/07/13 21:46, David Ahern wrote:
> On 7/1/13 2:01 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> On 28/06/13 20:19, David Ahern wrote:
>>> On 6/28/13 2:43 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>>>> The list_head is on the stack, so just free the rest of the list.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> tools/perf/util/parse-events.c | 7 ++++++-
>>>> tools/perf/util/parse-events.h | 1 +
>>>> tools/perf/util/pmu.c | 2 +-
>>>> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
>>>> b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
>>>> index 995fc25..d9cb055 100644
>>>> --- a/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
>>>> +++ b/tools/perf/util/parse-events.c
>>>> @@ -1231,12 +1231,17 @@ int parse_events_term__clone(struct
>>>> parse_events_term **new,
>>>> term->val.str, term->val.num);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> -void parse_events__free_terms(struct list_head *terms)
>>>> +void parse_events__free_terms_only(struct list_head *terms)
>>>> {
>>>> struct parse_events_term *term, *h;
>>>>
>>>> list_for_each_entry_safe(term, h, terms, list)
>>>> free(term);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +void parse_events__free_terms(struct list_head *terms)
>>>> +{
>>>> + parse_events__free_terms_only(terms);
>>>>
>>>> free(terms);
>>>> }
>>>
>>> I still don't understand the reasoning for an _only function. There is only
>>> 1 place that mallocs the list_head and that 1 user should free its own
>>> memory. All of the other users pass a stack variable.
>>
>> No. See parse-events.y
>
> Fine. Fix both then. My point is that parse-events.c code should not be
> freeing memory it does not allocate.
No. Read the code. The 'head' member is shared with other lists. It does
not make sense to turn a tiny bug-fix into such a lot of re-work.
>>
>> The list head is defined as a pointer in the YYTYPE stack element:
>>
>> %union
>> {
>> char *str;
>> u64 num;
>> struct list_head *head;
>> struct parse_events_term *term;
>> }
>>
>> It is malloc'ed when terms are created:
>>
>> event_term
>> {
>> struct list_head *head = malloc(sizeof(*head));
>> struct parse_events_term *term = $1;
>>
>> ABORT_ON(!head);
>> INIT_LIST_HEAD(head);
>> list_add_tail(&term->list, head);
>> $$ = head;
>> }
>>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-02 6:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-28 8:43 [PATCH V3 00/15] perf tools: some fixes and tweaks Adrian Hunter
2013-06-28 8:43 ` [PATCH V3 01/15] perf tools: remove unused parameter Adrian Hunter
2013-06-28 8:43 ` [PATCH V3 02/15] perf tools: fix missing tool parameter Adrian Hunter
2013-06-28 8:43 ` [PATCH V3 03/15] perf tools: fix missing 'finished_round' Adrian Hunter
2013-06-28 8:43 ` [PATCH V3 04/15] perf tools: fix parse_events_terms() segfault on error path Adrian Hunter
2013-06-28 8:43 ` [PATCH V3 05/15] perf tools: fix new_term() missing free " Adrian Hunter
2013-06-28 8:43 ` [PATCH V3 06/15] perf tools: fix parse_events_terms() freeing local variable " Adrian Hunter
2013-06-28 9:56 ` Jiri Olsa
2013-06-28 17:19 ` David Ahern
2013-07-01 8:01 ` Adrian Hunter
2013-07-01 18:46 ` David Ahern
2013-07-02 6:26 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2013-06-28 8:43 ` [PATCH V3 07/15] perf tools: add const specifier to perf_pmu__find name parameter Adrian Hunter
2013-06-28 8:43 ` [PATCH V3 08/15] perf tools: tidy duplicated munmap code Adrian Hunter
2013-06-28 8:43 ` [PATCH V3 09/15] perf tools: validate perf event header size Adrian Hunter
2013-06-28 8:43 ` [PATCH V3 10/15] perf tools: add debug prints Adrian Hunter
2013-06-28 8:43 ` [PATCH V3 11/15] perf tools: fix symbol_conf.nr_events Adrian Hunter
2013-06-28 8:43 ` [PATCH V3 12/15] perf tools: allow non-matching sample types Adrian Hunter
2013-06-28 8:43 ` [PATCH V3 13/15] perf tools: struct thread has a tid not a pid Adrian Hunter
2013-06-28 17:24 ` David Ahern
2013-06-28 8:43 ` [PATCH V3 14/15] perf tools: add pid to struct thread Adrian Hunter
2013-06-28 17:27 ` David Ahern
2013-06-28 8:43 ` [PATCH V3 15/15] perf tools: change "machine" functions to set thread pid Adrian Hunter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51D27280.30007@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@gmail.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).