public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
To: Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@samsung.com>
Cc: bzhao@marvell.com, linville@tuxdriver.com, rjw@sisk.pl,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shuahkhan@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wireless: Convert mwifiex/pcie to dev_pm_ops from legacy pm ops
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 20:51:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51D32116.4010109@hauke-m.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1372778675-2909-1-git-send-email-shuah.kh@samsung.com>

On 07/02/2013 05:24 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> Convert the mwifiex/pci driver to use dev_pm_ops for power management and
> remove Legacy PM handling. This change re-uses existing suspend and resume
> interfaces for dev_pm_ops.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@samsung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/pcie.c |   34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/pcie.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/pcie.c
> index 20c9c4c..b169318 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/pcie.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/pcie.c
> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static bool mwifiex_pcie_ok_to_access_hw(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter)
>   * If already not suspended, this function allocates and sends a host
>   * sleep activate request to the firmware and turns off the traffic.
>   */
> -static int mwifiex_pcie_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev, pm_message_t state)
> +static int __mwifiex_pcie_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter;
>  	struct pcie_service_card *card;
> @@ -112,6 +112,13 @@ static int mwifiex_pcie_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev, pm_message_t state)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int mwifiex_pcie_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> +
> +	return __mwifiex_pcie_suspend(pdev);
> +}
> +

For what do you need __mwifiex_pcie_suspend() ? Why not make one
function out of these two?

>  /*
>   * Kernel needs to suspend all functions separately. Therefore all
>   * registered functions must have drivers with suspend and resume
> @@ -120,7 +127,7 @@ static int mwifiex_pcie_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev, pm_message_t state)
>   * If already not resumed, this function turns on the traffic and
>   * sends a host sleep cancel request to the firmware.
>   */
> -static int mwifiex_pcie_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +static int __mwifiex_pcie_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter;
>  	struct pcie_service_card *card;
> @@ -150,6 +157,13 @@ static int mwifiex_pcie_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +
> +static int mwifiex_pcie_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> +
> +	return __mwifiex_pcie_resume(pdev);
> +}
>  #endif
>  
>  /*
> @@ -213,7 +227,7 @@ static void mwifiex_pcie_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  	if (user_rmmod) {
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM
>  		if (adapter->is_suspended)
> -			mwifiex_pcie_resume(pdev);
> +			__mwifiex_pcie_resume(pdev);

You could use mwifiex_pcie_resume(&pdev->dev) here and then the extra
function __mwifiex_pcie_resume() is not needed any more.

>  #endif
>  
>  		for (i = 0; i < adapter->priv_num; i++)
> @@ -249,6 +263,14 @@ static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(mwifiex_ids) = {
>  
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, mwifiex_ids);
>  
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +/* Power Management Hooks */
> +static const struct dev_pm_ops mwifiex_pcie_pm_ops = {
> +	.suspend = mwifiex_pcie_suspend,
> +	.resume = mwifiex_pcie_resume,
> +};
> +#endif
> +

Is it intended that you do not use SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() like most of the
other wifi drivers?

>  /* PCI Device Driver */
>  static struct pci_driver __refdata mwifiex_pcie = {
>  	.name     = "mwifiex_pcie",
> @@ -256,9 +278,9 @@ static struct pci_driver __refdata mwifiex_pcie = {
>  	.probe    = mwifiex_pcie_probe,
>  	.remove   = mwifiex_pcie_remove,
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM
> -	/* Power Management Hooks */
> -	.suspend  = mwifiex_pcie_suspend,
> -	.resume   = mwifiex_pcie_resume,
> +	.driver   = {
> +		.pm = &mwifiex_pcie_pm_ops,
> +	},
>  #endif
>  };
>  
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-07-02 18:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-02 15:24 [PATCH] wireless: Convert mwifiex/pcie to dev_pm_ops from legacy pm ops Shuah Khan
2013-07-02 18:30 ` Bing Zhao
2013-07-02 18:51 ` Hauke Mehrtens [this message]
2013-07-02 19:07   ` Bing Zhao
2013-07-02 19:24   ` Shuah Khan
2013-07-02 19:52     ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2013-07-02 22:59       ` Shuah Khan
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-07-03 16:47 [PATCH] wireless: Convert mwifiex/pcie to dev_pm_ops from legacy pm_ops Shuah Khan
2013-07-03 21:46 ` Bing Zhao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51D32116.4010109@hauke-m.de \
    --to=hauke@hauke-m.de \
    --cc=bzhao@marvell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=shuah.kh@samsung.com \
    --cc=shuahkhan@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox