From: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
To: Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@samsung.com>
Cc: bzhao@marvell.com, linville@tuxdriver.com, rjw@sisk.pl,
linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shuahkhan@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wireless: Convert mwifiex/pcie to dev_pm_ops from legacy pm ops
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 20:51:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51D32116.4010109@hauke-m.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1372778675-2909-1-git-send-email-shuah.kh@samsung.com>
On 07/02/2013 05:24 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> Convert the mwifiex/pci driver to use dev_pm_ops for power management and
> remove Legacy PM handling. This change re-uses existing suspend and resume
> interfaces for dev_pm_ops.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@samsung.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/pcie.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/pcie.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/pcie.c
> index 20c9c4c..b169318 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/pcie.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mwifiex/pcie.c
> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static bool mwifiex_pcie_ok_to_access_hw(struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter)
> * If already not suspended, this function allocates and sends a host
> * sleep activate request to the firmware and turns off the traffic.
> */
> -static int mwifiex_pcie_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev, pm_message_t state)
> +static int __mwifiex_pcie_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> {
> struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter;
> struct pcie_service_card *card;
> @@ -112,6 +112,13 @@ static int mwifiex_pcie_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev, pm_message_t state)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int mwifiex_pcie_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> +
> + return __mwifiex_pcie_suspend(pdev);
> +}
> +
For what do you need __mwifiex_pcie_suspend() ? Why not make one
function out of these two?
> /*
> * Kernel needs to suspend all functions separately. Therefore all
> * registered functions must have drivers with suspend and resume
> @@ -120,7 +127,7 @@ static int mwifiex_pcie_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev, pm_message_t state)
> * If already not resumed, this function turns on the traffic and
> * sends a host sleep cancel request to the firmware.
> */
> -static int mwifiex_pcie_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +static int __mwifiex_pcie_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> {
> struct mwifiex_adapter *adapter;
> struct pcie_service_card *card;
> @@ -150,6 +157,13 @@ static int mwifiex_pcie_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>
> return 0;
> }
> +
> +static int mwifiex_pcie_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
> +
> + return __mwifiex_pcie_resume(pdev);
> +}
> #endif
>
> /*
> @@ -213,7 +227,7 @@ static void mwifiex_pcie_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> if (user_rmmod) {
> #ifdef CONFIG_PM
> if (adapter->is_suspended)
> - mwifiex_pcie_resume(pdev);
> + __mwifiex_pcie_resume(pdev);
You could use mwifiex_pcie_resume(&pdev->dev) here and then the extra
function __mwifiex_pcie_resume() is not needed any more.
> #endif
>
> for (i = 0; i < adapter->priv_num; i++)
> @@ -249,6 +263,14 @@ static DEFINE_PCI_DEVICE_TABLE(mwifiex_ids) = {
>
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, mwifiex_ids);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM
> +/* Power Management Hooks */
> +static const struct dev_pm_ops mwifiex_pcie_pm_ops = {
> + .suspend = mwifiex_pcie_suspend,
> + .resume = mwifiex_pcie_resume,
> +};
> +#endif
> +
Is it intended that you do not use SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS() like most of the
other wifi drivers?
> /* PCI Device Driver */
> static struct pci_driver __refdata mwifiex_pcie = {
> .name = "mwifiex_pcie",
> @@ -256,9 +278,9 @@ static struct pci_driver __refdata mwifiex_pcie = {
> .probe = mwifiex_pcie_probe,
> .remove = mwifiex_pcie_remove,
> #ifdef CONFIG_PM
> - /* Power Management Hooks */
> - .suspend = mwifiex_pcie_suspend,
> - .resume = mwifiex_pcie_resume,
> + .driver = {
> + .pm = &mwifiex_pcie_pm_ops,
> + },
> #endif
> };
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-02 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-02 15:24 [PATCH] wireless: Convert mwifiex/pcie to dev_pm_ops from legacy pm ops Shuah Khan
2013-07-02 18:30 ` Bing Zhao
2013-07-02 18:51 ` Hauke Mehrtens [this message]
2013-07-02 19:07 ` Bing Zhao
2013-07-02 19:24 ` Shuah Khan
2013-07-02 19:52 ` Lars-Peter Clausen
2013-07-02 22:59 ` Shuah Khan
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-07-03 16:47 [PATCH] wireless: Convert mwifiex/pcie to dev_pm_ops from legacy pm_ops Shuah Khan
2013-07-03 21:46 ` Bing Zhao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51D32116.4010109@hauke-m.de \
--to=hauke@hauke-m.de \
--cc=bzhao@marvell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=shuah.kh@samsung.com \
--cc=shuahkhan@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox