public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Avi Kivity <avi.kivity@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/kvm/emulate.c: simplify NOP (opcode 0x90) check
Date: Thu, 04 Jul 2013 13:06:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51D55728.4060909@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130704091345.GB5113@redhat.com>

On 07/04/2013 11:13 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 10:58:29AM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
>> The check sits in switch() statement which itself can check
>> for opcode 0x90 far more efficiently.
>>
>> On assembler level, this change simply eliminates the following
>> bit of code:
>>
>> 4c 8b a3 d8 00 00 00    mov    0xd8(%rbx),%r12
>> 31 f6                   xor    %esi,%esi
>> 48 89 df                mov    %rbx,%rdi
>> e8 32 8c ff ff          callq  490 <reg_read>
>> 48 8d 83 78 01 00 00    lea    0x178(%rbx),%rax
>> 83 8b 70 01 00 00 01    orl    $0x1,0x170(%rbx)
>> 83 8b 74 01 00 00 01    orl    $0x1,0x174(%rbx)
>> 49 39 c4                cmp    %rax,%r12
>> 0f 84 88 fa ff ff       je     7304 <x86_emulate_insn+0x204>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
>> CC: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> CC: Avi Kivity <avi.kivity@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c | 6 +++---
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
>> index 2bc1e81..7e6e74a 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
>> @@ -4544,9 +4544,9 @@ special_insn:
>>  	case 0x8d: /* lea r16/r32, m */
>>  		ctxt->dst.val = ctxt->src.addr.mem.ea;
>>  		break;
>> -	case 0x90 ... 0x97: /* nop / xchg reg, rax */
>> -		if (ctxt->dst.addr.reg == reg_rmw(ctxt, VCPU_REGS_RAX))
>> -			break;
>> +	case 0x90: /* nop */
>> +		break;
> This does not work on 64bit and REX prefix.

Can you elaborate?

0x90 is special-cased in CPU to be a NOP regardless of bit width.
IOW, xchg %eax,%eax ordinarily would clear upper 32 bits of %rax,
but 0x90 doesn't do that.

Do you mean that with REX.R==1, 0x90 will refer to R8?


  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-04 11:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-04  8:58 [PATCH] x86/kvm/emulate.c: simplify NOP (opcode 0x90) check Denys Vlasenko
2013-07-04  9:13 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-04 11:06   ` Denys Vlasenko [this message]
2013-07-04 11:07     ` Gleb Natapov
2013-07-04 11:08     ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51D55728.4060909@redhat.com \
    --to=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=avi.kivity@gmail.com \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox