From: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
eranian@google.com, andi@firstfloor.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] perf, x86: Save/resotre LBR stack during context switch
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 13:36:24 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51D65B58.1050201@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130704124536.GK23916@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 07/04/2013 08:45 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 03:23:04PM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
>
>> @@ -2488,25 +2508,31 @@ static void perf_branch_stack_sched_in(struct task_struct *prev,
>>
>> list_for_each_entry_rcu(pmu, &pmus, entry) {
>> cpuctx = this_cpu_ptr(pmu->pmu_cpu_context);
>> + task_ctx = cpuctx->task_ctx;
>>
>> /*
>> - * check if the context has at least one
>> - * event using PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK
>> + * force flush the branch stack if there are cpu-wide events
>> + * using PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK
>> + *
>> + * save/restore the branch stack if the task context has
>> + * at least one event using PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK
>> */
>> - if (cpuctx->ctx.nr_branch_stack > 0
>> - && pmu->flush_branch_stack) {
>> -
>> + bool force_flush = cpuctx->ctx.nr_branch_stack > 0;
>> + if (pmu->branch_stack_sched &&
>> + (force_flush ||
>> + (task_ctx && task_ctx->nr_branch_stack > 0))) {
>> pmu = cpuctx->ctx.pmu;
>>
>> - perf_ctx_lock(cpuctx, cpuctx->task_ctx);
>> + perf_ctx_lock(cpuctx, task_ctx);
>>
>> perf_pmu_disable(pmu);
>>
>> - pmu->flush_branch_stack();
>> + pmu->branch_stack_sched(task_ctx,
>> + sched_in, force_flush);
>>
>> perf_pmu_enable(pmu);
>>
>> - perf_ctx_unlock(cpuctx, cpuctx->task_ctx);
>> + perf_ctx_unlock(cpuctx, task_ctx);
>> }
>> }
>>
>
> I never really like this; and yes I know I wrote part of that. Is there
> any way we can get rid of this and to it 'properly' through the events
> that get scheduled?
>
> After all; the LBR usage is through the events, so scheduling the events
> should also manage the LBR state.
>
> What is missing for that to work?
>
the LBR is shared resource, can be used by multiple events at the same time.
Strictly speaking,LBR is associated with task, not event. One example is
there are 5 events using the LBR stack feature, but there are only 4 counters.
So these events need schedule. Saving/restoring LBR on the basis of event is
clearly wrong.
Regards
Yan, Zheng
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-05 5:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-01 7:23 [PATCH v2 0/7] perf, x86: Haswell LBR call stack support Yan, Zheng
2013-07-01 7:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] perf, x86: Reduce lbr_sel_map size Yan, Zheng
2013-07-01 7:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] perf, x86: Basic Haswell LBR call stack support Yan, Zheng
2013-07-01 7:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] perf, x86: Introduce x86 special perf event context Yan, Zheng
2013-07-04 12:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-05 3:19 ` Yan, Zheng
2013-07-05 12:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-08 8:51 ` Yan, Zheng
2013-07-01 7:23 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] perf, x86: Save/resotre LBR stack during context switch Yan, Zheng
2013-07-04 9:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-04 11:39 ` Yan, Zheng
2013-07-04 13:44 ` Andi Kleen
2013-07-04 14:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-10 17:57 ` Andi Kleen
2013-07-04 12:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-04 12:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-05 5:36 ` Yan, Zheng [this message]
2013-07-05 8:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-05 8:51 ` Yan, Zheng
2013-07-05 12:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-08 6:18 ` Yan, Zheng
2013-07-01 7:23 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] perf, core: Pass perf_sample_data to perf_callchain() Yan, Zheng
2013-07-01 7:23 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] perf, x86: Use LBR call stack to get user callchain Yan, Zheng
2013-07-01 7:23 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] perf, x86: Discard zero length call entries in LBR call stack Yan, Zheng
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-10-24 5:59 [PATCH V2 0/7] perf, x86: Haswell LBR call stack support Yan, Zheng
2012-10-24 5:59 ` [PATCH V2 4/7] perf, x86: Save/resotre LBR stack during context switch Yan, Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51D65B58.1050201@intel.com \
--to=zheng.z.yan@intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox