public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hp.com>
To: Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Cc: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>,
	Eric Paris <eparis@parisplace.org>,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Chandramouleeswaran,
	Aswin" <aswin@hp.com>, "Norton, Scott J" <scott.norton@hp.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v5] SELinux: Reduce overhead of mls_level_isvalid() function call
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 13:10:32 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51D6FE08.8030904@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51B70EE4.5030209@tycho.nsa.gov>

On 06/11/2013 07:49 AM, Stephen Smalley wrote:
> On 06/10/2013 01:55 PM, Waiman Long wrote:
>> v4->v5:
>>    - Fix scripts/checkpatch.pl warning.
>>
>> v3->v4:
>>    - Merge the 2 separate while loops in ebitmap_contains() into
>>      a single one.
>>
>> v2->v3:
>>    - Remove unused local variables i, node from mls_level_isvalid().
>>
>> v1->v2:
>>   - Move the new ebitmap comparison logic from mls_level_isvalid()
>>     into the ebitmap_contains() helper function.
>>   - Rerun perf and performance tests on the latest v3.10-rc4 kernel.
>>
>> While running the high_systime workload of the AIM7 benchmark on
>> a 2-socket 12-core Westmere x86-64 machine running 3.10-rc4 kernel
>> (with HT on), it was found that a pretty sizable amount of time was
>> spent in the SELinux code. Below was the perf trace of the "perf
>> record -a -s" of a test run at 1500 users:
>>
>>    5.04%            ls  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] ebitmap_get_bit
>>    1.96%            ls  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] mls_level_isvalid
>>    1.95%            ls  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] find_next_bit
>>
>> The ebitmap_get_bit() was the hottest function in the perf-report
>> output.  Both the ebitmap_get_bit() and find_next_bit() functions
>> were, in fact, called by mls_level_isvalid(). As a result, the
>> mls_level_isvalid() call consumed 8.95% of the total CPU time of
>> all the 24 virtual CPUs which is quite a lot. The majority of the
>> mls_level_isvalid() function invocations come from the socket creation
>> system call.
>>
>> Looking at the mls_level_isvalid() function, it is checking to see
>> if all the bits set in one of the ebitmap structure are also set in
>> another one as well as the highest set bit is no bigger than the one
>> specified by the given policydb data structure. It is doing it in
>> a bit-by-bit manner. So if the ebitmap structure has many bits set,
>> the iteration loop will be done many times.
>>
>> The current code can be rewritten to use a similar algorithm as the
>> ebitmap_contains() function with an additional check for the
>> highest set bit. The ebitmap_contains() function was extended to
>> cover an optional additional check for the highest set bit, and the
>> mls_level_isvalid() function was modified to call ebitmap_contains().
>>
>> With that change, the perf trace showed that the used CPU time drop
>> down to just 0.08% (ebitmap_contains + mls_level_isvalid) of the
>> total which is about 100X less than before.
>>
>>    0.07%            ls  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] ebitmap_contains
>>    0.05%            ls  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] ebitmap_get_bit
>>    0.01%            ls  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] mls_level_isvalid
>>    0.01%            ls  [kernel.kallsyms]     [k] find_next_bit
>>
>> The remaining ebitmap_get_bit() and find_next_bit() functions calls
>> are made by other kernel routines as the new mls_level_isvalid()
>> function will not call them anymore.
>>
>> This patch also improves the high_systime AIM7 benchmark result,
>> though the improvement is not as impressive as is suggested by the
>> reduction in CPU time spent in the ebitmap functions. The table below
>> shows the performance change on the 2-socket x86-64 system (with HT
>> on) mentioned above.
>>
>> +--------------+---------------+----------------+-----------------+
>> |   Workload   | mean % change | mean % change  | mean % change   |
>> |              | 10-100 users  | 200-1000 users | 1100-2000 users |
>> +--------------+---------------+----------------+-----------------+
>> | high_systime |     +0.1%     |     +0.9%      |     +2.6%       |
>> +--------------+---------------+----------------+-----------------+
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hp.com>
>
> Acked-by:  Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
>

Thank for the Ack. Will that patch go into v3.11?

Regards,
Longman

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-05 17:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-10 17:55 [PATCH 1/2 v5] SELinux: Reduce overhead of mls_level_isvalid() function call Waiman Long
2013-06-11 11:49 ` Stephen Smalley
2013-07-05 17:10   ` Waiman Long [this message]
2013-07-08 14:09     ` Stephen Smalley
2013-07-08 16:30     ` Paul Moore
2013-07-08 20:05       ` Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51D6FE08.8030904@hp.com \
    --to=waiman.long@hp.com \
    --cc=aswin@hp.com \
    --cc=eparis@parisplace.org \
    --cc=james.l.morris@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=scott.norton@hp.com \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox