public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@kernel.org,
	eranian@google.com, andi@firstfloor.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] perf, x86: Introduce x86 special perf event context
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 16:51:03 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51DA7D77.3000806@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130705124500.GS23916@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On 07/05/2013 08:45 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 11:19:31AM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
>> On 07/04/2013 08:41 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> It should be *optional*, also wtf is that parent_ctx thing for?
>>
>> parent_ctx is for the fork() case, used for checking if the callstack feature
>> is enabled for the parent task. If yes, clone  parent task's LBR stack.
>> For the simple program below:
> 
> So there's a problem with all this; contexts aren't strict per task, we
> play games with them in perf_event_context_sched_out(). We'd have to
> disable that context switch optimization for LBR stack to work and
> that's massively expensive.
> 

Sorry, I didn't realize the optimization. I will describe my change in more details
in the further.

Yan, Zheng

> If you actually did that, you again fail for not having mentioned this
> in your changelog.
> 
> I'm starting to not want to read patches from you; going through them is
> just too much effort, I might as well write the stuff myself :/
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-08  8:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-01  7:23 [PATCH v2 0/7] perf, x86: Haswell LBR call stack support Yan, Zheng
2013-07-01  7:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] perf, x86: Reduce lbr_sel_map size Yan, Zheng
2013-07-01  7:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] perf, x86: Basic Haswell LBR call stack support Yan, Zheng
2013-07-01  7:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] perf, x86: Introduce x86 special perf event context Yan, Zheng
2013-07-04 12:41   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-05  3:19     ` Yan, Zheng
2013-07-05 12:45       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-08  8:51         ` Yan, Zheng [this message]
2013-07-01  7:23 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] perf, x86: Save/resotre LBR stack during context switch Yan, Zheng
2013-07-04  9:57   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-04 11:39     ` Yan, Zheng
2013-07-04 13:44     ` Andi Kleen
2013-07-04 14:00       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-10 17:57         ` Andi Kleen
2013-07-04 12:44   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-04 12:45   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-05  5:36     ` Yan, Zheng
2013-07-05  8:15       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-05  8:51         ` Yan, Zheng
2013-07-05 12:31           ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-08-08  6:18             ` Yan, Zheng
2013-07-01  7:23 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] perf, core: Pass perf_sample_data to perf_callchain() Yan, Zheng
2013-07-01  7:23 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] perf, x86: Use LBR call stack to get user callchain Yan, Zheng
2013-07-01  7:23 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] perf, x86: Discard zero length call entries in LBR call stack Yan, Zheng
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-10-24  5:59 [PATCH V2 0/7] perf, x86: Haswell LBR call stack support Yan, Zheng
2012-10-24  5:59 ` [PATCH V2 3/7] perf, x86: Introduce x86 special perf event context Yan, Zheng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51DA7D77.3000806@intel.com \
    --to=zheng.z.yan@intel.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox