From: Wei Ni <wni@nvidia.com>
To: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>,
"linux@arm.linux.org.uk" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org" <lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org>,
Matthew Longnecker <MLongnecker@nvidia.com>,
Alex Courbot <acourbot@nvidia.com>,
"linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dt: t30 cardhu: add dt entry for lm90
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 15:48:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51DBC058.2040904@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130709062112.GC17499@mithrandir>
On 07/09/2013 02:21 PM, Thierry Reding wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 06:14:21AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 08, 2013 at 05:36:05PM +0800, Wei Ni wrote:
>>> On 07/08/2013 03:50 PM, Jean Delvare wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 15:35:48 +0800, Wei Ni wrote:
>>>>> On 07/06/2013 01:38 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>>>>>> On 07/04/2013 03:09 AM, Wei Ni wrote:
>>>>>>> Enable thermal sensor lm90 for t30 cardhu.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-cardhu.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-cardhu.dtsi
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> + nct1008: nct1008 {
>>>>>>> + compatible = "lm90,nct1008";
>>>>>>
>>>>>> "lm90" isn't a valid vendor prefix. I believe the value you want is
>>>>>> "onnn,nct1008". Same comment for patch 2/2.
>>>>>
>>>>> The lm90 doesn't support device tree very well.
>>>>
>>>> I doubt it, but if this is the case, then please fix it, instead of
>>>> working the problem around in a different place.
>>>>
>>>>> In the DT, we need to
>>>>> named as "lm90" so that the lm90 driver can be loaded,
>>>>
>>>> Not that I am an expert with regards to DT, but this doesn't make any
>>>> sense to me. AFAIK DT is about devices, not which drivers handle them.
>>>>
>>>>> and we also need
>>>>> to add "nct1008" to indicate this is the nct1008 device, so that the
>>>>> lm90 driver can be loaded with the right i2c_device_id->driver_data.
>>>>>
>>>>> I set the " compatible = "lm90,nct1008" ", this is the simplest way, and
>>>>> we doesn't need to change the lm90.c.
>>>>
>>>> There's no problem with changing the lm90 driver, if this is the right
>>>> thing to do.
>>>
>>> Ok, I will add DT support in the lm90.c in my next version patch.
>>>
>> Only if you can show that it is necessary.
>
> It should work out of the box. As a matter of fact the same chip is used
> on Tamonten and the DTS files use "onnn,nct1008". That used to work. If
> it no longer does then that's a regression.
I synced the linux-next from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git
and use the tag v3.10-rc7, but in the lm90.c it doesn't have DT support,
such as "onnn,nct1008".
I googled it and found there has patch:
[PATCH] hwmon: (lm90) Add device tree support , which is in:
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2013-February/038099.html
, but it didn't be merged into the linux-next.
which git repository and branch should I use ?
Thanks.
Wei.
>
> Thierry
>
> * Unknown Key
> * 0x7F3EB3A1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-09 7:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-04 9:09 [PATCH 0/2] Enable lm90 in Tegra30 and Tegra114 Wei Ni
2013-07-04 9:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dt: t30 cardhu: add dt entry for lm90 Wei Ni
2013-07-05 17:38 ` Stephen Warren
2013-07-08 7:35 ` Wei Ni
2013-07-08 7:50 ` [lm-sensors] " Jean Delvare
2013-07-08 9:36 ` Wei Ni
2013-07-08 13:14 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-07-09 6:21 ` Thierry Reding
2013-07-09 7:48 ` Wei Ni [this message]
2013-07-09 7:55 ` Jean Delvare
2013-07-09 8:58 ` Wei Ni
2013-07-08 13:12 ` Guenter Roeck
2013-07-04 9:09 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dt: t114 dalmore: " Wei Ni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51DBC058.2040904@nvidia.com \
--to=wni@nvidia.com \
--cc=MLongnecker@nvidia.com \
--cc=acourbot@nvidia.com \
--cc=khali@linux-fr.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org \
--cc=swarren@wwwdotorg.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox