From: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@elte.hu, eranian@google.com,
ak@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Update event buffer tail when overwriting old events
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 08:46:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51DE0073.3020403@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130710114408.GS25631@dyad.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 07/10/2013 07:44 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 07:37:43PM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
>> On 07/08/2013 08:15 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 01:58:06PM +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote:
>>>> From: "Yan, Zheng" <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
>
>>>> before overwrite mode after overwrite mode
>>>> AVG 1000 999 1046 1044
>>>> STDEV 19.4 19.5 17.1 17.9
>>>
>>> OK, so I was sure I replied to this email; but apparently I didn't :/
>>>
>>> So its still adding about 5% overhead to the regular case; this is sad.
>>>
>>> What does something like the below do?
>>>
>>
>> I re-test the patch on a different 32 core sandybridge-ep machine. the result is quite good.
>>
>> origin origin overwrite modified modified overwrite
>> AVG 1000 1044 960 1006
>> STDEV 39.0 26.0 28.1 14.4
>
> Nice! -- you did fix the snafu for the overwrite more before testing right?
>
yes, of course.
Regards
Yan, Zheng
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-11 0:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-06 5:58 [PATCH] perf: Update event buffer tail when overwriting old events Yan, Zheng
2013-06-18 9:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-08 12:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-09 6:18 ` Namhyung Kim
2013-07-09 7:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-09 7:05 ` Yan, Zheng
2013-07-09 8:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-09 13:52 ` Yan, Zheng
2013-07-09 14:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-10 11:37 ` Yan, Zheng
2013-07-10 11:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-11 0:46 ` Yan, Zheng [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51DE0073.3020403@intel.com \
--to=zheng.z.yan@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox