From: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
Rafael <rjw@sisk.pl>, Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com>, Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.de>,
Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>,
Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI: introduce PCIe Device Serial NUmber Capability support
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 10:36:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51DE1A35.2030108@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAErSpo6L8W40JBjNfE+bf_HWaW5be0VLdK+YyN3+J+05--ukyA@mail.gmail.com>
>> + */
>> +void pci_get_dsn(struct pci_dev *dev, u64 *sn)
>
> How about:
>
> u64 pci_device_serial_number(struct pci_dev *dev)
>
> "get" suggests reference counting, which isn't happening here. And
> why pass a pointer to a return value when we can just as easily return
> it directly?
Yes, u64 pci_device_serial_number(struct pci_dev *dev) is better, thanks!
>
id pci_init_capabilities(struct pci_dev *dev)
>> /* Power Management */
>> pci_pm_init(dev);
>>
>> + /* Device Serial Number */
>> + pci_dsn_init(dev);
>
> dev->sn = pci_serial_number(dev);
>
> Obvious, no comment or wrapper function needed.
OK, will remove the unnecessary comment.
>
>> +
>> /* Vital Product Data */
>> pci_vpd_pci22_init(dev);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-11 2:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-09 7:55 [PATCH 1/2] PCI: introduce PCIe Device Serial NUmber Capability support Yijing Wang
2013-07-09 8:09 ` Gu Zheng
2013-07-09 8:20 ` Yijing Wang
2013-07-10 21:57 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-07-11 2:36 ` Yijing Wang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51DE1A35.2030108@huawei.com \
--to=wangyijing@huawei.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=guz.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=jiang.liu@huawei.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oneukum@suse.de \
--cc=pebolle@tiscali.nl \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox