linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@linux.intel.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bpetkov@suse.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH 1/2 v2] x86: introduce int3-based instruction patching
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2013 13:51:05 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51DF1AB9.2010405@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1307112127530.29788@pobox.suse.cz>

On 07/11/2013 12:29 PM, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Jul 2013, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> 
>>>> + * The way it is done:
>>>> + *	- add a int3 trap to the address that will be patched
>>>> + *	- sync cores
>>>
>>> You don't need this "sync cores". (and your code didn't) :)
>>
>> I believe you do, lest you get "Frankenstructions".  I believe you don't
>> need the second one, however.  I should dig up my notes on this.
> 
> I found this post from 2010 from you:
> 
> 	http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1001.1/01530.html
> 
> If it's still valid and you guys at Intel haven't discovered any reason 
> why that procedure would be invalid, I'll send out v3 with that'd be using 
> exactly this ordering of syncing of the cores.
> 

Just a note on that: in that post "In fact, if a suitable int3 handler
is left permanently in place then step 5 is unnecessary as well" should
obviously have been "the synchronization in step 4" rather than "step 5".

	-hpa


  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-07-11 20:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-10 20:25 [RFC] [PATCH 0/2] x86: make jump labels use int3-based breakpoint instead of stop_machine() Jiri Kosina
2013-07-10 20:25 ` [RFC] [PATCH 1/2] x86: introduce int3-based instruction patching Jiri Kosina
2013-07-10 21:31   ` [RFC] [PATCH 1/2 v2] " Jiri Kosina
2013-07-10 21:36     ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-10 21:48       ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-10 21:56         ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-10 22:14           ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-10 22:39       ` Jiri Kosina
2013-07-11  3:29       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-07-11 10:09       ` Jiri Kosina
2013-07-11 10:54         ` Jiri Kosina
2013-07-11 16:31         ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-11 16:46           ` Steven Rostedt
2013-07-11 19:21             ` Jiri Kosina
2013-07-12  1:00             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-07-11 14:35       ` Steven Rostedt
2013-07-11 14:47         ` Jason Baron
2013-07-10 21:46     ` Joe Perches
2013-07-11 10:23     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-07-11 10:51       ` Jiri Kosina
2013-07-12  0:50         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-07-11 16:10       ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-11 19:29         ` Jiri Kosina
2013-07-11 20:49           ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-11 20:51           ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2013-07-11 15:57     ` Steven Rostedt
2013-07-11 19:43       ` Jiri Kosina
2013-07-11 19:52         ` Steven Rostedt
2013-07-10 20:25 ` [RFC] [PATCH 2/2] x86: make jump_label use int3-based patching Jiri Kosina
2013-07-10 22:26 ` [RFC] [PATCH 0/2] x86: make jump labels use int3-based breakpoint instead of stop_machine() Jason Baron
2013-07-11  0:04   ` Jiri Kosina
2013-07-11 16:42     ` Steven Rostedt
2013-07-11 19:23       ` Jiri Kosina
2013-07-11 19:54         ` Steven Rostedt
2013-07-11  2:21 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-07-11 20:26 ` [PATCH 2/2 v3] x86: make jump_label use int3-based patching Jiri Kosina
2013-07-12  2:12   ` Steven Rostedt
2013-07-12  5:44   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-07-11 20:26 ` [PATCH 1/2 v3] x86: introduce int3-based instruction patching Jiri Kosina
2013-07-11 20:53   ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-11 21:04     ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-11 21:36       ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-12  7:57         ` Borislav Petkov
2013-07-17  3:59           ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-11 22:31     ` Jiri Kosina
2013-07-12  2:09       ` Steven Rostedt
2013-07-11 23:01   ` Joe Perches
2013-07-12  2:07   ` Steven Rostedt
2013-07-12  2:40   ` Masami Hiramatsu
2013-07-12  9:21 ` [PATCH 1/2 v4] " Jiri Kosina
2013-07-17  1:18   ` [tip:x86/jumplabel] x86: Introduce int3 (breakpoint) -based " tip-bot for Jiri Kosina
2013-07-12  9:22 ` [PATCH 2/2 v4] x86: make jump_label use int3-based patching Jiri Kosina
2013-07-17  1:18   ` [tip:x86/jumplabel] x86: Make " tip-bot for Jiri Kosina

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51DF1AB9.2010405@linux.intel.com \
    --to=hpa@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bpetkov@suse.de \
    --cc=jbaron@redhat.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).