From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933339Ab3GLQ2b (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jul 2013 12:28:31 -0400 Received: from www.sr71.net ([198.145.64.142]:46605 "EHLO blackbird.sr71.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932612Ab3GLQ2a (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jul 2013 12:28:30 -0400 Message-ID: <51E02EA8.9090700@sr71.net> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 09:28:24 -0700 From: Dave Hansen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ingo Molnar CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: perf: fix incorrect use of do_div() in nmi warning References: <20130708214404.B0B6EA66@viggo.jf.intel.com> <20130712120843.GA21708@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20130712120843.GA21708@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/12/2013 05:08 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: >> > Note, there was a second fix posted by Stephane Eranian for >> > a separate patch which I also botched: >> > >> > http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20130704223010.GA30625@quad >> > >> > Both of these fixes need to get pulled in to Linus's tree and >> > the 3.10 stable tree. > This is a brand new v3.11 commit. > > It should not be included in any -stable tree, is it? Ingo, you are correct. The commit only appeared in Linus's tree post-3.10. It does not need to be in any stable trees.