From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757543Ab3GLTYL (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jul 2013 15:24:11 -0400 Received: from smtp.opengridcomputing.com ([72.48.136.20]:33577 "EHLO smtp.opengridcomputing.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757318Ab3GLTYK (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Jul 2013 15:24:10 -0400 Message-ID: <51E057DE.5050909@opengridcomputing.com> Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:24:14 -0500 From: Steve Wise User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Jones , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Oops mystery References: <51E02545.7080106@opengridcomputing.com> <20130712164816.GE1020@redhat.com> <51E0348A.2030208@opengridcomputing.com> <20130712170046.GB1537@redhat.com> <51E03809.5030307@opengridcomputing.com> <20130712171422.GC1537@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20130712171422.GC1537@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/12/2013 12:14 PM, Dave Jones wrote: > On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 12:08:25PM -0500, Steve Wise wrote: > > > There is no 'Code:' line in the log. I thought about that that too, but > > I don't see it dumping the code. The kernel is a SLES11sp1 kernel, > > 1.6.32.54-0.3-default. > > "Ask suse" is probably your best bet in that case. > > > [ 1054.392502] Modules linked in: smb2(N) smb(N) smb_manager(N) > > nas_netlink(N) af_packet nfsd nfs_common(N) lockd auth_rpcgss nas_acl(N) > > nas_proto_vfs(N) sunrpc snas_ts(N) ipmi_devintf snas_cafs(PN) snas_ca(N) > > ipmi_si ipmi_msghandler snas_mds(PN) snas_ds(N) nm(PN) snas_nvcache(PN) > > snas_dlm(PN) snas_trns(PN) snas_cm_sdd(PN) snas_cm_pma(PN) > > disk_online_diagnostic(N) snas_monc(N) snas_fc(N) snas_mml(PN) cstl(PN) > > ptlrpc(N) ko2iblnd(N) ksocklnd(N) obdclass(N) lnet(N) lvfs(PN) libcfs(N) > > snas_base(PN) nofs(N) usos(N) zlib_deflate cpufreq_conservative > > cpufreq_userspace cpufreq_powersave acpi_cpufreq t3k_mpt2sas_vdl(N) > > raidrepair(N) ib_ipoib ib_umad iw_nes crc32c libcrc32c iw_cxgb3 cxgb3 > > ib_qib(N) dca mlx4_ib mlx4_en mlx4_core ib_mthca nvdimm_mapping(N) > > smbuspci(N) microcode t4_tom(N) toecore(N) rdma_ucm ib_uverbs rdma_cm > > ib_cm iw_cm ib_sa ib_mad ib_addr ipv6 iw_cxgb4(N) ib_core > > soft_watchdog(PN) kbox(PN) fuse loop dm_mod tpm_tis tpm iTCO_wdt > > rtc_cmos tpm_bios i2c_i801 cxgb4(N) pcspkr iTCO_vendor_support i2c_core > > rtc_core ses sg rtc_lib bnx2 enclosure wmi button container usbhid hid > > ehci_hcd usbcore sd_mod crc_t10dif edd ext3 mbcache jbd fan processor > > mpt2sas scsi_transport_sas raid_class scsi_mod thermal thermal_sys hwmon > > Or maybe one of the proprietary module vendors. Who knows. > > I was hoping someone could verify that my analysis is correct, or if I've come to the wrong conclusion due to some mistake in my analysis. Steve.