From: boris brezillon <b.brezillon@overkiz.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] USB: ohci-at91: add usb_clk for transition to common clk framework
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 19:08:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51E57DFC.5030302@overkiz.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1307161246130.1032-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Hello Alan,
On 16/07/2013 18:48, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2013, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
>
>> The AT91 PMC (Power Management Controller) provides an USB clock used by
>> USB Full Speed host (ohci) and USB Full Speed device (udc).
>> The usb drivers (ohci and udc) must configure this clock to 48Mhz.
>> This configuration was formely done in mach-at91/clock.c, but this
>> implementation will be removed when moving to common clk framework.
>>
>> This patch add support for usb clock retrieval and configuration, and is
>> backward compatible with the current at91 clk implementation (if usb clk
>> is not found, it does not configure/enable the usb clk).
> But it does print a warning in the system log, right?
Yes it does.
>
>> @@ -144,6 +150,11 @@ static int usb_hcd_at91_probe(const struct hc_driver *driver,
>> goto err2;
>> }
>>
>> + uclk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, "usb_clk");
>> + if (IS_ERR(uclk)) {
>> + uclk = NULL;
>> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "failed to get usb_clk\n");
>> + }
> Is this really what you want for backward compatibility?
Here are some proposition to remove the warning message:
1) replace it with a dev_info and change the message:
dev_info(&pdev->dev, "failed to get usb_clk (most likely using old
at91 clk implementation)\n");
2) drop the log and silently ignore the missing clk (I'm not a big fan
of this solution
as it may lead to some errors if we're using new clk implem and the
clock is really missing)
3) rework the current clk_set_rate function to accept clk_set_rate on
usb clk and add clk_lookup entries
for the usb clk (I'm not a big fan of this solution neither as this
modifications will only be used for a short time
until the transition to common clk framework is completed).
> Alan Stern
>
Thanks for your review.
Best Regards,
Boris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-16 17:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-16 15:03 [PATCH v3 0/7] ARM: at91: prepare transition to common clk framework Boris BREZILLON
2013-07-16 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] ARM: at91/tc/clocksource: replace clk_enable/disable with clk_prepare_enable/disable_unprepare Boris BREZILLON
2013-07-16 15:48 ` Daniel Lezcano
2013-07-16 15:06 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] mmc: atmel-mci: prepare clk before calling enable Boris BREZILLON
2013-07-16 15:13 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-07-16 15:49 ` boris brezillon
2013-07-16 17:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-07-16 15:08 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] at91/avr32/atmel_lcdfb: " Boris BREZILLON
2013-07-16 15:10 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] USB: gadget: atmel_usba: " Boris BREZILLON
2013-07-16 15:16 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] spi: atmel: " Boris BREZILLON
2013-07-17 8:10 ` Mark Brown
2013-07-16 15:22 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] USB: ohci-at91: add usb_clk for transition to common clk framework Boris BREZILLON
2013-07-16 16:48 ` Alan Stern
2013-07-16 17:08 ` boris brezillon [this message]
2013-07-16 18:47 ` Alan Stern
2013-07-16 19:06 ` boris brezillon
2013-07-16 17:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-07-17 15:33 ` Alan Stern
2013-07-17 15:45 ` boris brezillon
2013-07-17 16:17 ` Alan Stern
2013-07-16 15:25 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] usb: gadget: at91_udc: " Boris BREZILLON
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51E57DFC.5030302@overkiz.com \
--to=b.brezillon@overkiz.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ludovic.desroches@atmel.com \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=plagnioj@jcrosoft.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox