Re: [PATCH] reiserfs: check/extend buffer length for printing functions

[Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>]

On 07/18/2013 03:54 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 07/18/2013 03:43 PM, Al Viro wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 03:29:17PM +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
>>>> On 07/18/2013 12:28 PM, Chen Gang wrote:
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>>  	strcpy(fmt1, fmt);
>>>>>>>> @@ -199,46 +214,51 @@ static void prepare_error_buf(const char *fmt, va_list args)
>>>>>>>>  	while ((k = is_there_reiserfs_struct(fmt1, &what)) != NULL) {
>>>>>>>>  		*k = 0;
>>>>>>>>  
>>>>>>>> -		p += vsprintf(p, fmt1, args);
>>>>>>>> +		p += vsnprintf(p, left, fmt1, args);
>>>>
>>>> At least, need use vscnprintf() instead of vsnprintf(), since we need
>>>> the real written length return.
>> 		n = vsnprintf(p, left, ....);
>> 		left -= n;
>> 		if (left <= 0) /* overflow */
>> 			break;	/* or whatever's suitable here */
>> 		p += n;
>>
>>
> 
> Yeah, it is really a better fix. :-)
> 
> 
> And now I am just testing, and find another issue about it, I am just
> analyzing it it.


even only change vsprintf() to vsnprintf(), it will report '<7' !!

----------------------------diff begin---------------------------------

diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/prints.c b/fs/reiserfs/prints.c
index c0b1112..9dd79be 100644
--- a/fs/reiserfs/prints.c
+++ b/fs/reiserfs/prints.c
@@ -238,7 +238,8 @@ static void prepare_error_buf(const char *fmt, va_list args)
 		p += strlen(p);
 		fmt1 = k + 2;
 	}
-	vsprintf(p, fmt1, args);
+
+	vsnprintf(p, 13, fmt1, args);
 	spin_unlock(&error_lock);
 
 }

----------------------------diff end-----------------------------------

This patch seems related with this new issue.  So After I finish
analyzing it (get root cause), then send the patch v2 for this patch.


Thanks.

> 
> For next-20130717, let reiserfs build-in, when "mount /dev/sda11
> /mnt/sda11" (assume sda11 is reiserfs filesystem).
> 
> I modify the code like this (just only use vsnprintf instead of vsprintf):
> 
> --------------------------diff begin------------------------------
> 
> diff --git a/fs/reiserfs/prints.c b/fs/reiserfs/prints.c
> index c0b1112..3a38a62 100644
> --- a/fs/reiserfs/prints.c
> +++ b/fs/reiserfs/prints.c
> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
>  
>  #include <stdarg.h>
>  
> -static char error_buf[1024];
> +static char error_buf[13];
>  static char fmt_buf[1024];
>  static char off_buf[80];
>  
> @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ static void prepare_error_buf(const char *fmt, va_list args)
>  	spin_lock(&error_lock);
>  
>  	strcpy(fmt1, fmt);
> -
> +#if 0
>  	while ((k = is_there_reiserfs_struct(fmt1, &what)) != NULL) {
>  		*k = 0;
>  
> @@ -238,7 +238,8 @@ static void prepare_error_buf(const char *fmt, va_list args)
>  		p += strlen(p);
>  		fmt1 = k + 2;
>  	}
> -	vsprintf(p, fmt1, args);
> +#endif
> +	vsnprintf(p, 13, fmt1, args);
>  	spin_unlock(&error_lock);
>  
>  }
> 
> --------------------------diff end--------------------------------
> 
> 
> The output has '<7>':
> 
> [root@dhcp122 ~]# dmesg
> [   38.797073] REISERFS (device sda11): found reiser
> [   38.797089] REISERFS warning (device sda11):  reiserfs_fill_super: CONFIG_REISE
> [   38.797095] REISERFS warning (device sda11):  reiserfs_fill_super: - it is slow
> [   38.797098] REISERFS (device sda11): using orderereiserfs: using flush barriers
> [   38.800507] REISERFS (device sda11): journal para
> [   38.801158] REISERFS (device sda11): checking tra<7>[   38.801165] REISERFS debug (device sda11): journal-1153
> [   38.801405] REISERFS debug (device sda11): journal-1206
> [   38.801410] REISERFS debug (device sda11): journal-1299
> [   38.817621] REISERFS (device sda11): Using r5 has
> [   38.817906] SELinux: initialized (dev sda11, type reiserfs), uses genfs_contexts
> 
> 
> 
> Welcome any suggestions or completions.
> 
> Thanks.
> 


-- 
Chen Gang