From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1760744Ab3GSR37 (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jul 2013 13:29:59 -0400 Received: from terminus.zytor.com ([198.137.202.10]:45650 "EHLO mail.zytor.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751239Ab3GSR36 (ORCPT ); Fri, 19 Jul 2013 13:29:58 -0400 Message-ID: <51E97779.3020103@zytor.com> Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 10:29:29 -0700 From: "H. Peter Anvin" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ramkumar Ramachandra CC: LKML , Rusty Russell Subject: Re: [QUERY] lguest64 References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 07/19/2013 02:06 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote: > Hi, > > I tried building lguest to play with it, but was disappointed to find > this in the Kconfig: > > depends on X86_32 > > Why is this [1]? What is so hard about supporting 64-bit machines? I > found a five-year old tree that claims to do lguest64 [2], but didn't > investigate further. > Please don't have us deal with another lguest unless there is a use case for it. We want to reduce pvops and pvops users, not increase them... -hpa