From: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
To: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
lpoetter@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] um: change defconfig to stop spawning xterm
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 12:38:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51ED0BBF.7060502@nod.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALkWK0=0NWediExGCwJ3R-O+7V_9sgGzJPUaXgaTEka5O05N=Q@mail.gmail.com>
CC'ing Lennart.
Am 22.07.2013 11:45, schrieb Ramkumar Ramachandra:
> Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
>> [1]: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2013-July/012152.html
>
> ... and the patches were rejected. Lennart says that UML providing
> /dev/tty* is wrong, and that UML should call them /dev/hvc* (or
> something). Can we do something about the situation? Can we remove
> /dev/tty*, and provide /dev/hvc*? Will we be breaking existing users?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> UML shouldn't be penalized for not implementing some terminal emulation,
>> but it should be penalized for doing so under the label of "VT support",
>> which it simply is not providing.
>>
>> They can call their ttys any way they want. If the call them
>> /dev/tty[1..64] however, then they need to implement the VC
>> interfaces. All of them.
Lennart, can you please explain us why /dev/tty[1..64] is forced to
have virtual console support?
Thanks,
//richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-22 10:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-19 18:20 [PATCH] um: change defconfig to stop spawning xterm Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-07-19 18:44 ` Richard Weinberger
2013-07-19 19:44 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-07-22 9:45 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-07-22 10:38 ` Richard Weinberger [this message]
2013-07-22 10:43 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-07-22 11:48 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-07-22 22:32 ` Lennart Poettering
2013-07-23 5:40 ` Richard Weinberger
2013-07-23 5:47 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2013-07-23 7:57 ` Al Viro
2013-07-24 16:49 ` Lennart Poettering
2013-07-24 16:38 ` Lennart Poettering
2013-07-22 12:40 ` Al Viro
2013-07-22 13:02 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-07-22 13:20 ` Richard Weinberger
2013-07-22 13:42 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-07-22 14:08 ` Richard Weinberger
2013-07-22 15:33 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-07-22 19:29 ` Richard Weinberger
2013-07-22 20:01 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51ED0BBF.7060502@nod.at \
--to=richard@nod.at \
--cc=artagnon@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpoetter@redhat.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox