From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753508Ab3GYBAV (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jul 2013 21:00:21 -0400 Received: from szxga03-in.huawei.com ([119.145.14.66]:51420 "EHLO szxga03-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752228Ab3GYBAT (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jul 2013 21:00:19 -0400 Message-ID: <51F07863.2070705@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 08:59:15 +0800 From: Li Zefan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michal Hocko CC: Tejun Heo , Andrew Morton , Glauber Costa , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Johannes Weiner , LKML , Cgroups , Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] memcg, cgroup: kill css_id References: <51EFA554.6080801@huawei.com> <20130724143214.GL2540@dhcp22.suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <20130724143214.GL2540@dhcp22.suse.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.135.68.215] X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2013/7/24 22:32, Michal Hocko wrote: > On Wed 24-07-13 17:58:44, Li Zefan wrote: >> This patchset converts memcg to use cgroup->id, and then we can remove >> cgroup css_id. >> >> As we've removed memcg's own refcnt, converting memcg to use cgroup->id >> is very straight-forward. >> >> The patchset is based on Tejun's cgroup tree. > > Does it depend on any particular patches? I am asking because I would > need to cherry pick those and apply them into my -mm git tree before > these. > Nope, but you should see a few but small conflicts if you apply them to your git tree.