From: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@huawei.com>, Li Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] smp: kill unnecessary variable - csd_flags
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 09:46:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51F71AEC.1090709@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130729121305.GE3008@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 2013/7/29 20:13, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:29:45AM +0800, Xie XiuQi wrote:
>> We used csd_flags formerly because we allocated csd_data by
>> kmalloc when "wait == 0". When fail to allocation, we will
>> fall back to on-stack allocation. "csd_data" might be invalid
>> after generic_exec_single return.
>>
>> But now we use per cpu data for single cpu ipi calls, and
>> csd_data can't fall back to on-stack allocation when "wait == 0".
>>
>> So csd_flags is unnecessary now. Remove it.
>
> The much simpler argument is that both callsites of
> generic_exec_single() do an unconditional csd_lock().
>
That's right. All csd_data are protected by csd_lock.
>> Signed-off-by: Xie XiuQi <xiexiuqi@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> kernel/smp.c | 11 +----------
>> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
>> index 4dba0f7..cac2b6e 100644
>> --- a/kernel/smp.c
>> +++ b/kernel/smp.c
>> @@ -186,25 +186,16 @@ void generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt(void)
>>
>> while (!list_empty(&list)) {
>> struct call_single_data *csd;
>> - unsigned int csd_flags;
>>
>> csd = list_entry(list.next, struct call_single_data, list);
>> list_del(&csd->list);
>>
>> - /*
>> - * 'csd' can be invalid after this call if flags == 0
>> - * (when called through generic_exec_single()),
>> - * so save them away before making the call:
>> - */
>> - csd_flags = csd->flags;
>> -
>> csd->func(csd->info);
>>
>> /*
>> * Unlocked CSDs are valid through generic_exec_single():
>> */
>> - if (csd_flags & CSD_FLAG_LOCK)
>> - csd_unlock(csd);
>> + csd_unlock(csd);
>
> The comment is completely useless and confusing after this; why do you
> leave it in?
>
Thanks for your comment, I'll remove the comment and send a new version soon.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-30 1:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-29 2:29 [PATCH] smp: kill unnecessary variable - csd_flags Xie XiuQi
2013-07-29 12:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-07-30 1:46 ` Xie XiuQi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51F71AEC.1090709@huawei.com \
--to=xiexiuqi@huawei.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox