From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Cc: Mike Rapoport <mike.rapoport@gmail.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [QUERY] lguest64
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 06:25:04 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51F91030.9060606@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130731131757.GB22124@phenom.dumpdata.com>
On 07/31/2013 06:17 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>>
>> The big problem with pvops is that they are a permanent tax on future
>> development -- a classic case of "the hooks problem." As such it is
>> important that there be a real, significant, use case with enough users
>> to make the pain worthwhile. With Xen looking at sunsetting PV support
>> with a long horizon, it might currently be possible to remove pvops some
>
> PV MMU parts specifically.
>
Pretty much stuff that is driverized on plain hardware doesn't matter.
What are you looking at with respect to the basic CPU control state?
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-31 13:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-19 9:06 [QUERY] lguest64 Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-07-19 17:29 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-19 17:42 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-07-19 18:46 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-19 20:36 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2013-08-01 17:22 ` Ramkumar Ramachandra
2013-08-01 13:04 ` Alex Elsayed
2013-07-23 1:28 ` Rusty Russell
2013-07-31 9:39 ` Mike Rapoport
2013-07-31 12:17 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-31 13:07 ` Mike Rapoport
2013-07-31 13:19 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-31 14:32 ` Mike Rapoport
2013-08-01 2:12 ` Rusty Russell
2013-08-02 14:27 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-07-31 13:17 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-31 13:25 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2013-08-02 19:09 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-08-04 12:37 ` Gleb Natapov
2013-08-05 16:50 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-08-05 16:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-08-05 17:16 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2013-07-31 15:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-08-01 7:18 ` Mike Rapoport
2013-08-08 19:15 ` Richard W.M. Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51F91030.9060606@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=artagnon@gmail.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.rapoport@gmail.com \
--cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox