From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1758343Ab3HBJ2e (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Fri, 2 Aug 2013 05:28:34 -0400
Received: from mail-we0-f179.google.com ([74.125.82.179]:64839 "EHLO
	mail-we0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1758078Ab3HBJ2c (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 2 Aug 2013 05:28:32 -0400
Message-ID: <51FB7BB6.1010606@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 11:28:22 +0200
From: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130704 Icedove/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: boris brezillon <b.brezillon@overkiz.com>
CC: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
        Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
        Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>,
        Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] ARM: at91/dt: make use of periph id macros
References: <1375339733-3488-1-git-send-email-b.brezillon@overkiz.com> <CACQ1gAj_KCJUnBGzv0bnGaUwMgWq-7Noe280YdLGPxK8Ofp3Bw@mail.gmail.com> <51FB7634.3080302@overkiz.com>
In-Reply-To: <51FB7634.3080302@overkiz.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 02/08/2013 11:04, boris brezillon wrote:
> Hello Richard,
> 
> On 01/08/2013 09:37, Richard Genoud wrote:
>> 2013/8/1 Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon@overkiz.com>:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> This patch series move at91 SoCs peripheral id definitions from machine
>>> specific include dir to dt-bindings include dir.
>>> These macros are used to reference interrupts instead of peripheral
>>> numbers.
>>>
>>> This makes dt definitions cleaner and easier to debug (one can easily
>>> tell if
>>> the peripheral macro used to reference an interrupt line is not the
>>> good one).
>>>
>>> These macros will be used for clk definitions and references too.
>>>
>>> I am not sure 'include/dt-bindings/at91/xxx' is the best place to put
>>> these
>>> definitions as there are no soc specific directories in dt-bindings
>>> include
>>> dir right now. Maybe something like
>>> 'include/dt-bindings/soc/at91/xxx' or
>>> 'include/dt-bindings/peripherals/at91/xxx' would be better.
>>> What do you think ?
>> Well, I'd rather use "atmel" than "at91" because, AFAIK, this prefix
>> has been dropped for new atmel SoCs (sama5 for instance).
> 
> Should I do the same for at91 clk series (replace drivers/clk/at91
> directory
> by drivers/clk/atmel and include/linux/clk/at91_pmc.h by
> include/linux/clk/atmel_pmc.h) ?
I would say so, but like you said, that needs atmel maintainer's feedback !