From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1756904Ab3HGCsd (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 6 Aug 2013 22:48:33 -0400
Received: from e23smtp05.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.147]:36191 "EHLO
	e23smtp05.au.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1756833Ab3HGCsb (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 6 Aug 2013 22:48:31 -0400
Message-ID: <5201B6FB.5080807@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 08:24:51 +0530
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Organization: IBM
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130625 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
CC: gleb@redhat.com, mingo@redhat.com, jeremy@goop.org, x86@kernel.org,
        konrad.wilk@oracle.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        habanero@linux.vnet.ibm.com, xen-devel@lists.xensource.com,
        peterz@infradead.org, mtosatti@redhat.com,
        stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com, andi@firstfloor.org,
        attilio.rao@citrix.com, ouyang@cs.pitt.edu, gregkh@suse.de,
        agraf@suse.de, chegu_vinod@hp.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
        avi.kivity@gmail.com, tglx@linutronix.de, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, riel@redhat.com, drjones@redhat.com,
        virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
        srivatsa.vaddagiri@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH  V12 0/14] Paravirtualized ticket spinlocks
References: <20130806114020.20643.57235.sendpatchset@codeblue.in.ibm.com> <52016412.1020608@zytor.com>
In-Reply-To: <52016412.1020608@zytor.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-TM-AS-MML: No
X-Content-Scanned: Fidelis XPS MAILER
x-cbid: 13080702-1396-0000-0000-0000035F0D38
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 08/07/2013 02:31 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> What is the baseline for this patchset?  I tried to apply it on top of
> 3.11-rc4 and I got nontrivial conflicts.
>

I had based it on top of 445363e8 [ Merge branch 'perf/urgent']
of tip.  Sorry for not mentioning that.

Please let me know, if I should rebase again.