From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
xi.wang@gmail.com, nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/sysctl_binary.c: improve the usage of return value 'result'
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 11:53:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5201C4AB.4070309@asianux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1375827089.2424.37.camel@joe-AO722>
On 08/07/2013 06:11 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 14:43 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Tue, 06 Aug 2013 15:29:42 +0800 Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Improve the usage of return value 'result', so not only can make code
>>> clearer to readers, but also can improve the performance.
>>
>> It used to be pervasive kernel style do to
>>
>> ret = -ENOMEM;
>> foo = alloc(...);
>> if (!foo)
>> goto out;
>>
>> whereas nowadays people usually do the more straightforward
>>
>> foo = alloc(...);
>> if (!foo) {
>> ret = -ENOMEM;
>> goto out;
>> }
>>
>> The thinking was that the old style generated better code, but for the
>> life of me I can't remember why :(
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/16/383
>
Thank you for your information.
--
Chen Gang
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-07 3:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-06 7:29 [PATCH] kernel/sysctl_binary.c: improve the usage of return value 'result' Chen Gang
2013-08-06 21:43 ` Andrew Morton
2013-08-06 22:11 ` Joe Perches
2013-08-07 3:53 ` Chen Gang [this message]
2013-08-06 22:13 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-08-07 5:28 ` Chen Gang F T
2013-08-07 5:11 ` Chen Gang
2013-08-06 21:46 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-08-07 5:07 ` Chen Gang
2013-08-07 5:56 ` Li Zefan
2013-08-07 6:10 ` Joe Perches
2013-08-07 6:29 ` Chen Gang
2013-08-07 6:42 ` Li Zefan
2013-08-07 6:42 ` Li Zefan
2013-08-07 6:57 ` Chen Gang
2013-08-07 6:24 ` Chen Gang
2013-08-07 6:29 ` Andrew Morton
2013-08-07 6:34 ` Chen Gang
2013-08-07 7:02 ` Li Zefan
2013-08-07 8:03 ` Chen Gang
2013-08-07 8:44 ` Li Zefan
2013-08-07 9:13 ` Chen Gang
2013-08-07 7:45 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-08-07 10:25 ` Chen Gang
2013-08-07 18:38 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-08-08 3:19 ` Chen Gang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5201C4AB.4070309@asianux.com \
--to=gang.chen@asianux.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=xi.wang@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox