public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	xi.wang@gmail.com, nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/sysctl_binary.c: improve the usage of return value 'result'
Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 11:53:15 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5201C4AB.4070309@asianux.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1375827089.2424.37.camel@joe-AO722>

On 08/07/2013 06:11 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 14:43 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Tue, 06 Aug 2013 15:29:42 +0800 Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Improve the usage of return value 'result', so not only can make code
>>> clearer to readers, but also can improve the performance.
>>
>> It used to be pervasive kernel style do to
>>
>> 	ret = -ENOMEM;
>> 	foo = alloc(...);
>> 	if (!foo)
>> 		goto out;
>>
>> whereas nowadays people usually do the more straightforward
>>
>> 	foo = alloc(...);
>> 	if (!foo) {
>> 		ret = -ENOMEM;
>> 		goto out;
>> 	}
>>
>> The thinking was that the old style generated better code, but for the
>> life of me I can't remember why :(
> 
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2008/12/16/383
> 

Thank you for your information.

-- 
Chen Gang

  reply	other threads:[~2013-08-07  3:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-08-06  7:29 [PATCH] kernel/sysctl_binary.c: improve the usage of return value 'result' Chen Gang
2013-08-06 21:43 ` Andrew Morton
2013-08-06 22:11   ` Joe Perches
2013-08-07  3:53     ` Chen Gang [this message]
2013-08-06 22:13   ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-08-07  5:28     ` Chen Gang F T
2013-08-07  5:11   ` Chen Gang
2013-08-06 21:46 ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-08-07  5:07   ` Chen Gang
2013-08-07  5:56     ` Li Zefan
2013-08-07  6:10       ` Joe Perches
2013-08-07  6:29         ` Chen Gang
2013-08-07  6:42         ` Li Zefan
2013-08-07  6:42         ` Li Zefan
2013-08-07  6:57           ` Chen Gang
2013-08-07  6:24       ` Chen Gang
2013-08-07  6:29         ` Andrew Morton
2013-08-07  6:34           ` Chen Gang
2013-08-07  7:02         ` Li Zefan
2013-08-07  8:03           ` Chen Gang
2013-08-07  8:44             ` Li Zefan
2013-08-07  9:13               ` Chen Gang
2013-08-07  7:45     ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-08-07 10:25       ` Chen Gang
2013-08-07 18:38         ` Eric W. Biederman
2013-08-08  3:19           ` Chen Gang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5201C4AB.4070309@asianux.com \
    --to=gang.chen@asianux.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.dichtel@6wind.com \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=xi.wang@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox