From: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: "akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"grant.likely@linaro.org" <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
"rob.herring@calxeda.com" <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
"rob@landley.net" <rob@landley.net>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"rtc-linux@googlegroups.com" <rtc-linux@googlegroups.com>,
"gg@slimlogic.co.uk" <gg@slimlogic.co.uk>,
"kishon@ti.com" <kishon@ti.com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>,
Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@arm.com>,
"ian.campbell@citrix.com" <ian.campbell@citrix.com>,
"broonie@kernel.org" <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] drivers/rtc/rtc-palmas.c: support for backup battery charging
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2013 00:16:11 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <520295F3.2020401@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130807163804.GL28558@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On Wednesday 07 August 2013 10:08 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 07, 2013 at 11:29:52AM +0100, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>> +Optional properties:
>> +- ti,back-battery-charge-enable: The Palmas series device like TPS65913 or
>> + TPS80036 supports the battery backup for powering the RTC when main
>> + battery is removed or in very low power state. This flag will enable
>> + the backup battery charging.
> I don't like the wording here as it implies that an OS *must* charge the
> device, rather than that it *can* charge the device. How about:
>
> - ti,backup-battery-chargeable: There is a chargeable backup battery
> present.
>
The *org* property tells whether charging should be enable or not. This
is enabled during init and it is not the runtime configuration for
enable/disable.
By saying "backup-battery-chargeable" means it need other
interface/calls to start charging. It does not reflect that charging
will be enabled by default.
>> +- ti,back-battery-charge-low-current: Configure lower charging current. Device
>> + supports the charging current as < 100mA or >100mA. Low current will
>> + set as <100mA.
> This is somewhat unclear as it reads as a runtime configuration choice,
> rather than some instances of the device only support being changed at
> low currents (as I assume is the case?). How about:
>
> - ti,backup-battery-low-current: The backup battery is only chargeable
> at currents below 100mA.
Hmm.. I think even if battery can be charge for more than 100mA, there
is choice of configure it for less than 100mA.
> What happens if we charge at the wrong current?
Not much sure but I think it can create battery damage.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-07 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-07 10:29 [PATCH V4] drivers/rtc/rtc-palmas.c: support for backup battery charging Laxman Dewangan
2013-08-07 16:38 ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-07 18:46 ` Laxman Dewangan [this message]
2013-08-08 9:33 ` Mark Rutland
2013-08-08 17:17 ` Laxman Dewangan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=520295F3.2020401@nvidia.com \
--to=ldewangan@nvidia.com \
--cc=Pawel.Moll@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gg@slimlogic.co.uk \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=ian.campbell@citrix.com \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=swarren@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox